Titlebook: Rights and Decisions; Formal Models of Law Martin Hees Book 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1995 Liberal.Liberalism.decision

使閉塞

harmony

1572-4395 ines the game-theoretic approach with the results and toolsfrom logic, in particular from the logic of norms. The resultingsynthesis between logic and game theory provides a firm foundation forthe game-theoretic approach. The analysis shows how different types ofright are related to the strategic op

大量

Liberalism and Constitutional Decision Making, show that our framework enables us to answer this question from a liberal point of view. That is, we formulate and analyse . principles of constitutional decision making; principles which attach a predominant impor-tance to the protection of individual freedom..

sultry

聲明

LUDE

DLA*: Collective Agents,do, can do or may do things which the individuals on their own do not, cannot or may not do. It makes perfect sense to say that one soccer team beats another team and, at the same time, hold that none of the players has on his or her own defeated the other team. To give another example, the parliame

GRATE

比賽用背帶

Circumscribe

Liberalism and Conventional Decision Making,takes place. Because we first wanted to examine the relationship between rights and decision procedures, we postponed a discussion of the characteristics of liberalism. The semantics of the languages DLA and DLA* yielded models of processes of decision making. The models presented, i.e., the model s

攤位

Liberalism and Constitutional Decision Making,In particular, constitutional decision making is about the question of how rights and liberties should be allocated. The purpose of this chapter is to show that our framework enables us to answer this question from a liberal point of view. That is, we formulate and analyse . principles of constituti