Titlebook: Revolution and Reflection; Intellectual Change Andrew Lees Book 1974 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1974 Germany.Revolution.Soci

閘門

書目名稱Revolution and Reflection影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Revolution and Reflection影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Revolution and Reflection網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Revolution and Reflection網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Revolution and Reflection被引頻次




書目名稱Revolution and Reflection被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Revolution and Reflection年度引用




書目名稱Revolution and Reflection年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Revolution and Reflection讀者反饋




書目名稱Revolution and Reflection讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

毛細(xì)血管

Introduction,ment of modem Europe. Before 1848, according to the traditional view, the prevalent climate of opinion was idealistic, hopeful, humane, and progressive. Afterwards, it was empirical, pessimistic, cynical, and obsessed with power. As Hans Kohn put it in his essay “Mid-century: The Turning Point,” “In

摘要記錄

瘋狂

Debates about the Recent Past, demanded to be recounted and explained. Since Germany was well endowed with historians, many of whom had participated directly in political life, the challenge to make sense out of the recent past was quickly taken up. In scrutinizing contemporary history, the intellectuals hoped to prepare themsel

CLAP

Lipoprotein

Conflicting Answers to the Social Questions,, crime, emigration, and the other consequences of urbanization, industrialization, and population growth. The “social questions,” which had already begun to agitate Germans during the 1840’s, received closer scrutiny from many writers after the upheavals at mid-century, even though the intellectual

包租車船

DEI

assent

Canopy