找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Revisiting Searle on Deriving "Ought" from "Is"; Paolo Di Lucia,Edoardo Fittipaldi Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 28453|回復(fù): 54
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:34:47 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Revisiting Searle on Deriving "Ought" from "Is"
編輯Paolo Di Lucia,Edoardo Fittipaldi
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/830/829835/829835.mp4
概述Includes a new and unpublished essay by John R. Searle.Examines the Is/Ought question from the standpoints of semantics, pragmatics, the theory of constitutive rules, and legal theory.Provides an in-d
圖書封面Titlebook: Revisiting Searle on Deriving
描述.This book reconsiders the supposed impossibility of deriving "Ought" from "Is". John R. Searle’s 1964 article .How to Derive "Ought " from "Is’.’ sent shockwaves through the philosophical community by offering a straightforward counterexample to this claim of impossibility: from your promising something- and this is an "is" - it simply follows that you "ought" to do it. This volume opens with a brand new chapter from Searle who, in light of his subsequent philosophical developments, expounds the reasons for the validity of that derivation and its crucial significance for social ontology and moral philosophy. Then, in a fresh interview with the editors of this volume, Searle explores a range of topics including how his derivation relates to constitutive rules, and how he views Wittgenstein’s philosophy, deontic logic, and the rationality of action. ?..The remainder of the volume is dedicated to a deep dive into Searle’s essay and its implications by international scholars with diverse backgrounds ranging from analytic philosophy, phenomenology, and logic, to moral philosophy and the philosophy and sociology of law.??With thirteen original chapters, the contributors provide fresh an
出版日期Book 2021
關(guān)鍵詞semantics; Searle; Conte; Hume’s law; constitutive rules; regulative rules; Logic of practical reasoning; m
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54116-3
isbn_softcover978-3-030-54118-7
isbn_ebook978-3-030-54116-3
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2021
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Revisiting Searle on Deriving "Ought" from "Is"影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Revisiting Searle on Deriving "Ought" from "Is"影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Revisiting Searle on Deriving "Ought" from "Is"網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Revisiting Searle on Deriving "Ought" from "Is"網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Revisiting Searle on Deriving "Ought" from "Is"被引頻次




書目名稱Revisiting Searle on Deriving "Ought" from "Is"被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Revisiting Searle on Deriving "Ought" from "Is"年度引用




書目名稱Revisiting Searle on Deriving "Ought" from "Is"年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Revisiting Searle on Deriving "Ought" from "Is"讀者反饋




書目名稱Revisiting Searle on Deriving "Ought" from "Is"讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:39:56 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:42:52 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54116-3semantics; Searle; Conte; Hume’s law; constitutive rules; regulative rules; Logic of practical reasoning; m
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:44:32 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:34:21 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:07:24 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:36:54 | 只看該作者
How to Derive Is from Oughtstitutive rules. Here we are made to see that, since . eidetic-constitutive rules are conditions for the possibility and cognizability of peculiar forms of existence, they make Is-from-Ought derivations possible. [Abstract by eds.]
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:28:56 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:02:20 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:50:19 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-10 12:14
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
临潭县| 延长县| 册亨县| 海伦市| 文水县| 博兴县| 龙海市| 凤山市| 昌乐县| 盐源县| 会昌县| 康乐县| 绥德县| 邵武市| 东阿县| 池州市| 平江县| 玛曲县| 陆丰市| 朝阳区| 太原市| 阿城市| 图们市| 绍兴县| 逊克县| 阿瓦提县| 抚宁县| 永靖县| 榕江县| 三亚市| 民权县| 南康市| 枣强县| 太白县| 陇西县| 连城县| 钟山县| 东海县| 临高县| 庆阳市| 阳谷县|