找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Revisiting Marx’s Critique of Liberalism; Rethinking Justice, Igor Shoikhedbrod Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s),

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 貶損
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 11:10:48 | 只看該作者
Igor Shoikhedbroditical legitimacy no longer lay in managing the compromise between collective obligation and individual autonomy by reference to the modern ‘situation-centred ethico-morality’ that sustained eco-nomic-redistributive policymaking. The concerns of social citizenship, as expressed by organized labour,
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 14:57:59 | 只看該作者
comes apparent in conditions of industrialization is a shift in the way that political compromise over the social bond is enframed. The bourgeois citizenship-based conceptions of freedom, equality and autonomy that had been central to the mercantile state were, with the expansion of industrializatio
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 18:24:29 | 只看該作者
Book 2019ace of global financial capitalism and the hollowing out of democratically-enacted law. TheMarx that emerges from this book is therefore a thoroughly modern thinker whose insights shed valuable light on some of the most pressing challenges confronting liberal democracies today. .? ? ? ? ? ? ??.? ? ?
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 01:08:34 | 只看該作者
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 03:43:58 | 只看該作者
Situating Marx with Respect to Justice and Rightns on ., beginning with his youthful journalistic writings, which demonstrate a reliance on Hegelian natural law as basis for critiquing unjust laws. Later, Marx traces the origin of legal relations to historically specific relations of production. His new materialist outlook enables him to criticiz
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 09:34:26 | 只看該作者
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 11:27:31 | 只看該作者
The Normative Argument for Communist Legalityn the basis of commodity exchange. More specifically, a normative case is made for a communist version of legality that would mediate between the diverse and potentially conflicting projects pursued by socialized individuals under associated production. Communist legality would thus serve as a form
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 14:55:35 | 只看該作者
Contemporary Responses to Marx’s Critique of Liberal Justicecritique of liberal justice in the light of the challenges posed by global financial capitalism. These different theoretical responses to Marx reaffirm the tension between democratically enacted law and capitalist accumulative imperatives and underscore the importance of restructuring property arran
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 20:24:34 | 只看該作者
Democracy and the Riddle of All Constitutions: Marx’s Enduring Lessons Marx emerges as a thinker whose support for constitutionalism following the failed revolutions of 1848 was based on the view that constitutional consolidation depends critically upon the extension of democracy to the economic sphere. A contemporary Marxist approach to law has good reasons for recog
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 00:18:10 | 只看該作者
Conclusionook’s scope. These issues include rethinking the idea of the state in a globalized political economy, critiques of “moral” and “political progress” as they pertain to considerations of justice, legality, and rights, as well as renewed attempts at reconceptualizing the relationship between political
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-25 10:56
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
遂溪县| 东明县| 桦甸市| 塔河县| 麻阳| 寿宁县| 高碑店市| 景泰县| 卓尼县| 凤山县| 新河县| 大悟县| 榆社县| 郑州市| 城口县| 墨江| 德安县| 三穗县| 津南区| 牡丹江市| 禹城市| 三亚市| 运城市| 黔东| 正定县| 武乡县| 原平市| 政和县| 郑州市| 扬州市| 义马市| 娄底市| 长寿区| 宾川县| 酒泉市| 青铜峡市| 黄大仙区| 长子县| 嵊州市| 杨浦区| 屏边|