找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Revisiting Discovery and Justification; Historical and philo JUTTA SCHICKORE,FRIEDRICH STEINLE Book 2006 Springer Science+Business Media B.

[復制鏈接]
查看: 28816|回復: 51
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:26:43 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Revisiting Discovery and Justification
副標題Historical and philo
編輯JUTTA SCHICKORE,FRIEDRICH STEINLE
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/830/829815/829815.mp4
概述Historicises and contexualizes the ‘received view‘ of philosophy of science.Clears the grounds for the productive integration of history and philosophy of science.Caters to the recent interest in the
叢書名稱Archimedes
圖書封面Titlebook: Revisiting Discovery and Justification; Historical and philo JUTTA SCHICKORE,FRIEDRICH STEINLE Book 2006 Springer Science+Business Media B.
描述.The distinction between the contexts of discovery and justification has had a turbulent career in philosophy of science. At times celebrated as the hallmark of philosophical approaches to science, at times condemned as ambiguous, distorting, and misleading, the distinction dominated philosophical debates from the early decades of the twentieth century to the 1980s. Until today, it informs our conception of the content, domain, and goals of philosophy of science. It is due to this fact that new trends in philosophy of experimentation and history and sociology of science have been marginalized by traditional scholarship in philosophy. To acknowledge properly this important recent work we need to re-open the debate about the nature, development, and significance of the context distinction, about its merits and flaws. The contributions to this volume provide close readings and detailed analyses of the original textual sources for the context distinction. They revise those accounts of ‘forerunners’ of the distinction that have been written through the lens of Logical Empiricism. They map, clarify, and analyse the derivations and mutations of the context distinctions as we encounter the
出版日期Book 2006
關鍵詞experimentation; knowledge; philosophy of science; science; sociology
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4251-5
isbn_softcover978-90-481-7086-9
isbn_ebook978-1-4020-4251-5Series ISSN 1385-0180 Series E-ISSN 2215-0064
issn_series 1385-0180
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Revisiting Discovery and Justification影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Revisiting Discovery and Justification影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Revisiting Discovery and Justification網絡公開度




書目名稱Revisiting Discovery and Justification網絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Revisiting Discovery and Justification被引頻次




書目名稱Revisiting Discovery and Justification被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Revisiting Discovery and Justification年度引用




書目名稱Revisiting Discovery and Justification年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Revisiting Discovery and Justification讀者反饋




書目名稱Revisiting Discovery and Justification讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:31:20 | 只看該作者
FRIEDRICH STEINLEiers to trade between the member parties of the agreements. The process has accelerated with the failure of the multilateral Doha Round of negotiations to reach agreement. Since the pioneering effort by the NAFTA negotiations to include other issues in both the main FTA and corresponding side agreem
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:37:40 | 只看該作者
THOMAS POTTHASTiers to trade between the member parties of the agreements. The process has accelerated with the failure of the multilateral Doha Round of negotiations to reach agreement. Since the pioneering effort by the NAFTA negotiations to include other issues in both the main FTA and corresponding side agreem
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:57:17 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:50:29 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:54:58 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:04:56 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:37:33 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:24:11 | 只看該作者
Book 2006allmark of philosophical approaches to science, at times condemned as ambiguous, distorting, and misleading, the distinction dominated philosophical debates from the early decades of the twentieth century to the 1980s. Until today, it informs our conception of the content, domain, and goals of philo
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:35:22 | 只看該作者
CONTEXT OF DISCOVERY VERSUS CONTEXT OF JUSTIFICATION AND THOMAS KUHNly Kuhn opposed the DJ distinction. This is noteworthy, because in the 1960s and 1970s, many philosophers concluded from Kuhn’s opposition to the context distinction that he just did not understand what it was all about (and they inferred from this that he was just too uneducated as a philosopher to be taken seriously).
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-9 21:30
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
洪湖市| 揭东县| 察雅县| 新宾| 福贡县| 青田县| 綦江县| 黑水县| 曲麻莱县| 江城| 日喀则市| 二手房| 无锡市| 达拉特旗| 东兰县| 若羌县| 正安县| 荣成市| 林甸县| 临沧市| 衡南县| 德州市| 阿克陶县| 丹寨县| 万年县| 张掖市| 南宁市| 香港| 龙岩市| 叶城县| 金秀| 金乡县| 临安市| 广东省| 襄垣县| 玉环县| 怀远县| 安庆市| 汾西县| 泰宁县| 商河县|