找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Retraction Matters; New Developments in Dan Zeman,Mihai H?ncu Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive l

[復(fù)制鏈接]
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 05:34:39 | 只看該作者
Retraction Matters978-3-031-66081-8Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 07:42:26 | 只看該作者
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 13:54:14 | 只看該作者
Nevermind: On Retraction as a Speech Actformal account models the effect of a retraction on the context to restore the common ground to a prior state, computable from the conversational record. Our account also explains the status of speech acts that follow the target of retraction. Retractions are cognitively costly on our account, but, we argue, this is the right result.
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 19:40:06 | 只看該作者
0166-6991 tures new contributions from internationally renowned schola.This book offers the first sustained investigation of the phenomenon of retraction - the “taking back” of the conventional or deontic effects of a previous speech act - bringing together issues and solutions from the semantics of perspecti
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 21:48:55 | 只看該作者
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 00:49:46 | 只看該作者
Taste Predicates and Retraction Data: An Improved Frameworkstics. These debates have yielded many subtle and inventive analyses of PPT. There is, however, a crucial methodological question about PPT that remains underexplored: what sorts of . should be used in evaluating an account of PPT? In line with a fairly large body of recent work, we point out that s
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 04:40:17 | 只看該作者
Falsity and Retraction: New Experimental Data on Epistemic Modalstences and uses this evidence as part of a broader argument against assessment relativism. It follows other papers that reach similar conclusions, such as that of Knobe and Yalcin (Semant Pragmat 7:1–21, 2014). Its results were achieved simultaneously and independently of the more recent work of Kne
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 09:46:18 | 只看該作者
Relativism and Retraction: The Case Is Not Yet Losta variety of natural language expressions (predicates of taste, epistemic modals, moral and aesthetic claims etc.) in support of their view. The main consideration offered is that relativism can, while rival views cannot, account for this phenomenon. For some of those leading the charge, retraction
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 13:41:38 | 只看該作者
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 19:57:57 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 01:47
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
商洛市| 丘北县| 聂荣县| 海宁市| 连城县| 惠州市| 曲靖市| 亚东县| 普安县| 泸定县| 合阳县| 汉中市| 青岛市| 海林市| 双鸭山市| 平顺县| 平安县| 咸阳市| 临桂县| 文安县| 正安县| 临江市| 河池市| 襄汾县| 宾阳县| 稷山县| 安义县| 旬邑县| 隆德县| 讷河市| 桂东县| 广南县| 什邡市| 林周县| 湟中县| 丘北县| 登封市| 团风县| 邹平县| 齐河县| 遂平县|