找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Retirement, Pensions and Justice; A Philosophical Anal Mark Hyde,Rory Shand Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 30747|回復(fù): 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:03:42 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Retirement, Pensions and Justice
副標(biāo)題A Philosophical Anal
編輯Mark Hyde,Rory Shand
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/830/829257/829257.mp4
概述Bridges finance and philosophy by examining retirement systems in terms of justice.Clarifies the differences between classic and egalitarian liberal viewpoints within pension schemes.Looks at pension
圖書封面Titlebook: Retirement, Pensions and Justice; A Philosophical Anal Mark Hyde,Rory Shand Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017
描述.This book addresses the tendency to mischaracterise liberalism as a “neoliberal” reform project, arguing that liberal political philosophy is concerned only to sustain the conditions that make individual freedom possible. This is illustrated with reference to the design of pensions. Considered in terms of liberal justice, retirement systems require redistributive transfers to help the poor, measures to ensure that retirees are rewarded on their merits, and provisions that treat everyone with equal dignity and respect. Rather than presenting liberal pensions as a close analogue to neoliberalism, this volume highlights their egalitarian virtues. This book will appeal to scholars of retirement and pensions, social policy, economics and political philosophy..
出版日期Book 2017
關(guān)鍵詞Pension; Pension scheme; Retirement model; Pension Design; Justice; Social Policy; Social Solidarity; Liber
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60066-0
isbn_ebook978-1-137-60066-0
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Retirement, Pensions and Justice影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Retirement, Pensions and Justice影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Retirement, Pensions and Justice網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Retirement, Pensions and Justice網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Retirement, Pensions and Justice被引頻次




書目名稱Retirement, Pensions and Justice被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Retirement, Pensions and Justice年度引用




書目名稱Retirement, Pensions and Justice年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Retirement, Pensions and Justice讀者反饋




書目名稱Retirement, Pensions and Justice讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:29:26 | 只看該作者
Mark Hyde,Rory Shandlia and Malaysia these fundamental differences have to be addressed, and the implications of how these differences impact on refugee policy will be explored. In both cases the histories of ‘managing’ migrants and the cultural diversity of populations are open to interpretation, and are inherently po
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:49:26 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:32:44 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:04:23 | 只看該作者
Mark Hyde,Rory Shandbest way to promote its Senator brand in poor rural areas of Uganda was to have local performance troupes sing about it to their neighbors, in local languages and musical styles. (Ugandans speak more than 30 languages, and identify as many distinct cultures within their national boundaries.) The str
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:11:12 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:16:48 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:07:17 | 只看該作者
senting liberal pensions as a close analogue to neoliberalism, this volume highlights their egalitarian virtues. This book will appeal to scholars of retirement and pensions, social policy, economics and political philosophy..978-1-137-60066-0
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:28:01 | 只看該作者
Conclusion,liberties of all citizens. Alongside these virtues, we note that the critics of liberalism invariably endorse perspectives that are deeply flawed. Social policy analysis characteristically demonstrates an unacceptable degree of paternalism, premised on an unjustifiable faith in the capacity of government to act in the best interests of citizens.
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:57:48 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-8 22:26
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
铜陵市| 怀集县| 资阳市| 克拉玛依市| 安新县| 延津县| 鄂托克前旗| 托克逊县| 栾城县| 永春县| 三门县| 宁安市| 万荣县| 伊金霍洛旗| 宝坻区| 蓬安县| 白水县| 大冶市| 安陆市| 元氏县| 岳池县| 黄山市| 峨眉山市| 井冈山市| 平泉县| 沐川县| 镇沅| 南靖县| 康定县| 甘肃省| 金寨县| 新宁县| 旅游| 涡阳县| 无棣县| 隆昌县| 鄂温| 大埔区| 斗六市| 若羌县| 临漳县|