找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪(fǎng)問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Rethinking the BSE Crisis; A Study of Scientifi Louise Cummings Book 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 Epidemiological.Epidemi

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: duodenum
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 10:43:49 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9504-6Epidemiological; Epidemiology; Public Health; argue; epistemology; formal logic; knowledge; logic; reason; sc
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 17:55:44 | 只看該作者
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 19:00:08 | 只看該作者
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 01:19:43 | 只看該作者
ation of philosophy with public health science, an integration that is exemplified by the case of scientific reasoning during the BSE affair. It will therefore be of interest to advanced students, academics, re978-94-017-8491-7978-90-481-9504-6
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 05:10:38 | 只看該作者
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 09:28:41 | 只看該作者
The Scientific Challenge,ost abstract lessons for scientists who are charged with containing infectious diseases. In this chapter, I undertake this explanatory work by arguing that philosophical contributions on reasoning and argument are not only relevant to epidemiology, but that they also represent the very best prospect
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 11:49:33 | 只看該作者
Good Arguments During the BSE Inquiry,n of the fallacies achieved this facilitation in the case of scientific inquiry into BSE. The presumptive analyses of fallacies that have been advanced to date have certainly served to reveal rational features of the fallacies. These features have been largely obscured from view under traditionally
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 15:43:02 | 只看該作者
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 21:14:30 | 只看該作者
Learning the Lessons of the BSE Crisis, and to its capacity to provide objective, consistent scientific advice to the public. With such serious consequences emanating from the BSE affair, it is incumbent on all those who were involved in this tragic episode to reflect on the events that took place and to consider how things could have be
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 01:19:15 | 只看該作者
Book 2010r a number of epistemic gains upon scientific inquiry.This book argues for a closer integration of philosophy with public health science, an integration that is exemplified by the case of scientific reasoning during the BSE affair. It will therefore be of interest to advanced students, academics, re
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-18 11:16
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
临泽县| 福清市| 昆明市| 郑州市| 新河县| 庆安县| 苏尼特右旗| 伊金霍洛旗| 阜城县| 平远县| 绥芬河市| 老河口市| 正阳县| 衡阳市| 浏阳市| 临朐县| 邹城市| 涟源市| 宽甸| 敦煌市| 绥德县| 凌云县| 湘乡市| 明星| 闽清县| 湄潭县| 松滋市| 漳平市| 辉南县| 齐齐哈尔市| 闸北区| 沅江市| 通道| 资阳市| 南通市| 黔西| 四川省| 庐江县| 嵊泗县| 宣化县| 芦山县|