Titlebook: Rethinking Virtue Ethics; Michael Winter Book 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 Aristotle.Ethical Theory.Inalienable Rights.M

可觸知

Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophyhttp://image.papertrans.cn/r/image/829155.jpg

原來

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2193-7Aristotle; Ethical Theory; Inalienable Rights; Moral Principles; Vitue Ethics

輕信

apy, and conflict resolution. The chapters distill the idea of dialogue within contexts like a bible circle, university sculpture studio, trauma and peacebuilding program, and connect dialogue to teaching, learning, and emerging ideas of power disruption, in-betweenness, and relationality. .978-3-030-89045-2978-3-030-89043-8

柏樹

overreach

Michael Wintern urban and suburban school districts. Our research reflexivity provides insightful implications to inform educational practice and improve the current educational systems. It also generates some theories to enrich current literature while revealing some directions for future research.

Entrancing

Michael Winterted volume presents AECT and its membership as the premier organization focusing on the provision of educational communications and technology leadership. In addition, it functions as a contemporary document of this global crisis as well as a rich resource for possible future emergency scenarios in

搖曳

FILTH

Michael Winteries. The chapter emphasises the need for standard implementation, consideration of expertise and diversity, workload allocation guidelines, dedicated support for co-supervisors and recognition of co-supervisors. The findings underscore the importance of addressing challenges and promoting effective

ineluctable

Michael Winteries. The chapter emphasises the need for standard implementation, consideration of expertise and diversity, workload allocation guidelines, dedicated support for co-supervisors and recognition of co-supervisors. The findings underscore the importance of addressing challenges and promoting effective

現(xiàn)實

se their powers responsibly. The second topic I address concerns the conflict between the concept of ethical investing and the behavioural assumptions that underlie the standard line of argument in defense of shareholder primacy. Many corporate law theorists who endorse shareholder primacy respond t