找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Rethinking Thomas Kuhn’s Legacy; Yafeng Shan Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springe

[復制鏈接]
樓主: 諷刺文章
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:43:07 | 只看該作者
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 17:25:21 | 只看該作者
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 18:27:35 | 只看該作者
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 23:50:37 | 只看該作者
Thomas Kuhn, Modern Mathematics and the Dynamics of Reasonersity Press, Oxford, 1992) which took as their central question the usefulness for the philosophy of mathematics of Kuhn’s constructions in the philosophy of science. Important work was done to see whether the concepts of ‘revolution’ and ‘paradigm’ made sense there. However, a feature of the colle
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 04:02:21 | 只看該作者
Kuhn, Progress, and Knowing-How: An Epistemological-Functional Account of Scientific Progressogress comes down to improved problem-solving. It is important to realize that Kuhn talks about the progress of scientific .. This raises the question of in what sense exactly problem-solving is knowledge. This chapter then has two main goals. The first is to explain Kuhn’s account of problem-solvin
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 08:37:33 | 只看該作者
Worlds, Algorithms, and Niches: The Feedback-Loop Idea in Kuhn’s Philosophyuniversal algorithm thesis, and the niche-construction analogy. We will do that by resorting to a hitherto neglected notion employed by Kuhn: the idea of a feedback loop. We will show that this notion captures an important structural aspect of the epistemic dynamics at work in each of the three thes
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 14:05:17 | 只看該作者
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 18:21:44 | 只看該作者
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 21:42:34 | 只看該作者
Kuhn and Philosophyt it was ignored or snubbed and passed over in philosophical anthologies or textbooks. Secondly, I discuss how ., nevertheless, impacted philosophical development. Finally, I offer an explanation of Kuhn’s marginalization in analytic philosophy that goes beyond the prevalent view which says that he
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 23:13:14 | 只看該作者
Reappraising Kind Conceptsoncepts would be acquired through ostension and organized into hierarchical structures, also known as “taxonomies”. However, in one of his last papers, Kuhn introduced a second type of kind concept, one that is established through law-like generalisations, the singletons. In this chapter, I argue th
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-17 04:05
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
疏勒县| 札达县| 余干县| 德阳市| 镇康县| 庄河市| 西贡区| 尚义县| 普定县| 伊吾县| 通海县| 惠来县| 穆棱市| 永平县| 鄢陵县| 清河县| 陆良县| 吉林省| 博罗县| 杨浦区| 宣恩县| 龙里县| 彩票| 涿州市| 石台县| 揭东县| 台南市| 大安市| 余姚市| 新干县| 澄迈县| 盐边县| 巴里| 新泰市| 古田县| 开鲁县| 沙河市| 镇康县| 保康县| 南昌县| 务川|