Titlebook: Rethinking Popper; Zuzana Parusniková,Robert S. Cohen Conference proceedings 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Karl R. Popper

fabricate

A Problem for Popper’s Fallibilismriticized, it is usually claimed that the scope of fallibilism is restricted, and that there are some areas where infallible knowledge is possible. In the paper we develop a different line of argument. We attempt to show that fallibilism is self-contradictory. Let us consider the following propositi

refine

Why Advocate Pancritical Rationalism?e internally justified in accepting) that there is ‘justification’ in an externalist sense, specifically that certain procedures can track truth, and suggest that this recognition should inform practice; that one should try to determine which sources and methods are appropriate for various aspects o

莊嚴(yán)

Karl Popper and Hans Albert — The Broad Scope of Critical Rationalismrld that his views still continuously elicit a response, whether positive or negative. However, in Central Europe the slightly delayed Popper‘s influence has been quite often if not mediated then at least supported by other developments within German philosophy. Not surprisingly, from the very begin

可能性

任意

侵略主義

擴(kuò)張

GILD

綁架

Popper’s Theory of the Searchlight: A Historical Assessment of Its Significanceearchlight is historically rooted in early cognitive psychology of Otto Selz. It is furthermore argued that Popper‘s later critique of information processing psychology is the fruit of his assimilation of Selz‘s evolutionarily inspired program. In light of the current interest in evolutionary approa

明智的人

From Group Selection to Ecological Nichese. Hayek took up that challenge in a manuscript but failed to refute Popper‘s arguments. Drawing upon the same manuscript, Hayek developed a theory of behavioural rules and cultural evolution. Despite his criticism of the theory of mind on which this evolutionary theory was based, Popper adopted Hay