Titlebook: Rethinking International Relations; Fred Halliday Textbook 1994Latest edition Fred Halliday 1994 Cold War.conflict.historical materialism.

Fillmore

書(shū)目名稱Rethinking International Relations影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Rethinking International Relations影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Rethinking International Relations網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Rethinking International Relations網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Rethinking International Relations被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Rethinking International Relations被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Rethinking International Relations年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Rethinking International Relations年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Rethinking International Relations讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Rethinking International Relations讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

接觸

adroit

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23658-9Cold War; conflict; historical materialism; international relations; nationalism; revolution; social scien

outer-ear

arthrodesis

根除

Inter-Systemic Conflict: The Case of Cold War,y different, and incompatible, forms of social and political organisation. The main focus will be on the Cold War of the post-1945 period: but the implications are broader, and go to the heart of the debate on international society, and international relations, themselves.

separate

,Introduction: The Pertinence of the ‘International’,a brief account of the growth in the discipline, and the factors underlying this development. International Relations (IR) has occupied an uneasy, often marginal, place in the study and teaching of the social sciences. Yet its subject matter is, in the simplest terms, clear enough, comprising three

流動(dòng)性

Theories in Contention,hallenges the discipline of International Relations has, in recent years, been riven by a series of methodological debates the declared aim of which has been to resolve its underlying uncertainties and establish a more rigorous relationship with the real world beyond. Yet what resulted was, in too m

arrhythmic

空氣傳播

State and Society in International Relations, around the analytic primacy of the state as the constitutive actor in international relations, while some has focused on normative questions, of the degree to which the state can be regarded as the primary guarantor of what is good, within and between states. ‘State-centric’ realism has reasserted