找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Rethinking Descartes’s Substance Dualism; Lynda Gaudemard Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 Descartes Substance Dualism.Descar

[復制鏈接]
查看: 24962|回復: 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:01:07 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Rethinking Descartes’s Substance Dualism
編輯Lynda Gaudemard
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/830/829005/829005.mp4
概述Presents a new interpretation of Descartes’s philosophy of mind.Is the first new defence of a new version of emergent substance dualism.Is significant for the historical development of Descartes‘s as
叢書名稱Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind
圖書封面Titlebook: Rethinking Descartes’s Substance Dualism;  Lynda Gaudemard Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 Descartes Substance Dualism.Descar
描述.This monograph presents an interpretation of Descartes‘s dualism, which differs from the standard reading called ‘classical separatist dualism‘ claiming that the mind can exist without the body. It argues that, contrary to what it is commonly claimed, Descartes’s texts suggest an emergent creationist substance dualism, according to which the mind is a nonphysical substance (created and maintained by God), which cannot begin to think without a well-disposed body. According to this interpretation, God’s laws of nature endow each human body with the power to be united to an immaterial soul. While the soul does not directly come from the body, the mind can be said to emerge from the body in the sense that it cannot be created by God independently from the body. The divine creation of a human mind requires a well-disposed body, a physical categorical basis. This kind of emergentism is consistent with creationism and does not necessarily entail that the mind cannot survive the body.?.This early modern view has some connections with Hasker’s substance emergent dualism (1999). Indeed, Hasker?states that the mind is a substance emerging at one time from neurons and that consciousness has c
出版日期Book 2021
關鍵詞Descartes Substance Dualism; Descartes Philosophy of Mind; Descartes Mind; Descartes Imagination; Descar
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75414-3
isbn_softcover978-3-030-75416-7
isbn_ebook978-3-030-75414-3Series ISSN 1573-5834 Series E-ISSN 2542-9922
issn_series 1573-5834
copyrightSpringer Nature Switzerland AG 2021
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Rethinking Descartes’s Substance Dualism影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Rethinking Descartes’s Substance Dualism影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Rethinking Descartes’s Substance Dualism網絡公開度




書目名稱Rethinking Descartes’s Substance Dualism網絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Rethinking Descartes’s Substance Dualism被引頻次




書目名稱Rethinking Descartes’s Substance Dualism被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Rethinking Descartes’s Substance Dualism年度引用




書目名稱Rethinking Descartes’s Substance Dualism年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Rethinking Descartes’s Substance Dualism讀者反饋




書目名稱Rethinking Descartes’s Substance Dualism讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:36:19 | 只看該作者
The Real Distinction Between Mind and Body, argument, Descartes concludes that the mind can exist without the body. Many scholars argue that, for him, the mind does not need the brain to exist. If this separatist interpretation is true, then Descartes’s real distinction argument is not consistent with any kind of emergentism requiring a phys
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:48:10 | 只看該作者
Challenging the Cartesian Mind Paradigm,his claim conflicts with the separatist interpretation of real distinction argument. Furthermore, Descartes’s view of imagination leads to reconsider whether, for Descartes, the mind depends, in a certain way, on the body.
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:10:30 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:08:32 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:13:15 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:58:18 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:49:33 | 只看該作者
Introduction, are public and observable, while mental things are private and are only accessible by introspection. Lastly, for Descartes, to think is necessary to be conscious; while human beings are conscious, animals are unconscious, and are only machines.
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:49:41 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:38:09 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-21 12:24
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
裕民县| 无极县| 张北县| 合肥市| 金沙县| 大港区| 商南县| 新兴县| 乐东| 镇雄县| 麻阳| 施秉县| 项城市| 疏附县| 崇阳县| 广宗县| 广东省| 绥德县| 张家川| 鹤岗市| 广水市| 衢州市| 合阳县| 鄢陵县| 南溪县| 洛川县| 昆明市| 旬邑县| 奎屯市| 台北市| 和田市| 吴旗县| 仙桃市| 武清区| 长顺县| 民权县| 普陀区| 新丰县| 澎湖县| 庆安县| 宁乡县|