找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Restoring the Classic in Sociology; Traditions, Texts an Alan R. How Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 Hermene

[復制鏈接]
樓主: T-Lymphocyte
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 03:58:03 | 只看該作者
Book 2016ocess. Making a distinction between ‘classic’ and ‘canon’ which parallels that between ‘a(chǎn)gency’ and‘structure’, he allows the reader to appreciate the separate value of both. This major contribution to the field is essential reading for scholars and students of sociology and social theory.
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 11:09:33 | 只看該作者
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 14:40:42 | 只看該作者
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 16:45:41 | 只看該作者
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 21:36:20 | 只看該作者
In Pursuit of Identity: Fragmentation, Conflict and Crisiso broad outlooks were identified between those critics who are hostile to the idea of a canon of classics and advocates who defend its continuing value. In the latter part of the chapter, attention moved to some of the specific criticisms levelled at the sociological canon, and an initial defence of
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 03:25:07 | 只看該作者
On the Antipathy of Sociology to the Pastnth and early twentieth century intellectual history. These identities, the scientific and the humanistic, viewed the classic text differently. For scientific sociology, the classic belonged with the discipline’s pre-scientific condition and would become redundant when sociology came of age as a sci
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 06:23:49 | 只看該作者
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 09:50:47 | 只看該作者
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 14:40:16 | 只看該作者
The Hermeneutic Approacht often regards the past as over and done with and thus something that should play no further part in the discipline’s current concerns. The effect of this is to produce a binary opposition between the present and the past where the latter, including the classics, is thought to be surplus to contemp
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 20:13:06 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-30 01:40
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
永靖县| 通山县| 榕江县| 重庆市| 雅江县| 大新县| 汶川县| 印江| 永丰县| 临邑县| 台东县| 滁州市| 河北区| 雅安市| 汝南县| 南丰县| 营山县| 原阳县| 腾冲县| 贡山| 鲁山县| 武义县| 凤台县| 中方县| 东至县| 忻州市| 科技| 青田县| 婺源县| 张掖市| 顺平县| 崇明县| 宝清县| 延边| 衡南县| 丽江市| 正安县| 宁河县| 浮山县| 清流县| 岗巴县|