Titlebook: Responsibility and Punishment; J. Angelo Corlett Book 20011st edition Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2001 Immanuel Kant.reparations.

外科醫(yī)生

The Problem of Punishment, of the desiderata of a theory of punishment.. First, it is desired that a theory of punishment . so as to avoid conceptual confusion. This leads naturally to a recognition of various senses of punishment, from imprisonment to physically hard treatment, compensation, among other means of dealing wit

討好女人

Foundations of a Kantian Retributivism,ishment are paradigmatically retributivist. For if there is one thing Kant holds it is that criminal guilt deserves punishment, regardless of utility considerations. Does Kant have anything further to say about punishment than this? If so, do his ideas about punishment amount to a theory of punishme

無效

transient-pain

船員

ostracize

鑒賞家

Collective Wrongdoing, Reparations, and Native Americans,e: the seizure by the French, the British, the Spanish, the Dutch (and later by the United States and Canadian governments, respectively) of millions of acres of land inhabited by Native (North) Americans; the genocide (or attempt therein) of various Native Americans. by the U.S. military at the ord

Indolent

花費

Morsel

The Problem of Punishment,n Rawls’ .. For what justifies the former might not justify the latter, for example. It might well be the case that it is morally justified to punish criminals, but of the particular forms of punishment available for specific criminal cases, none is morally fitting. In any case, it is desired that a