找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Respect for Thought; Jan Smedslund’s Lega Tobias G. Lindstad,Erik St?nicke,Jaan Valsiner Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 Theo

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 本義
41#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 16:14:02 | 只看該作者
How to Avoid Throwing the Baby Out with the Bathwater: Abduction Is the Solution to Pseudo-Empiricisc nature of psychological phenomena. Accordingly, the second part of the paper proposes the view of psychological phenomena in terms of inherent formal (rather than efficient) causality and an approach to them based on the combination of dialectically abstract theory and abductive analysis of local
42#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 20:30:14 | 只看該作者
A Priori Afterthoughts: Continuing the Dialogue on Psycho-Logicbut also that Psycho-logic comprises a far more varied body of knowledge than hitherto recognized. As such, Psycho-logic is not about concepts, words, or common-sense, but more fundamentally about possible relations between possible properties of persons.
43#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 00:12:46 | 只看該作者
44#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 03:47:42 | 只看該作者
Smedslund and the Psychological Style of Reasoningctions as a style of reasoning, and the ways it creates conditions of possibility in which psychological properties become articulated and attain ontological status. Subsequently, Smedslund’s analysis of psychological pseudoempiricism and, particularly, his insights concerning the miscasting of anal
45#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 10:00:08 | 只看該作者
Book 2020...Respect for Thought. is a valuable resource for psychological researchers, historians of psychology, cultural psychologists, critical psychologists, theoretical psychologists, clinical psychologists and psychotherapists,social scientists, philosophers of psychology, and philosophers of science.?.
46#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 12:11:22 | 只看該作者
A Prehistory of My Present Positionween logic and understanding. I, then, describe three debates with Stanford psychologists: I tried to show that Albert Bandura’s theory of Self-Efficacy is necessarily true, whereas Bandura maintained that it was empirical. I still think that the core hypotheses are necessarily true, but that the co
47#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 19:09:22 | 只看該作者
A Place for Persons: The Formal Systems of Smedslund and Ossorio by behavioral scientists. Smedslund named his system “Psycho-logic” and described it as an axiomatization of “what persons . every person” (2012c, p. 661). Ossorio called his system the “Person Concept” and characterized it as a formal system providing access to all the facts and possible facts con
48#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 22:00:10 | 只看該作者
“The Concept of Correlation in Adults” Comes of Ageks of patient cards featuring the presence or absence of a specific disease along with the presence or absence of a specific symptom. Nearly all participants reported that the symptom was associated with the disease, so that the symptom would be useful for diagnostic purposes, although it occurred e
49#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 02:25:14 | 只看該作者
50#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 04:28:47 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-30 23:36
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
新野县| 大石桥市| 淮阳县| 金坛市| 若尔盖县| 兰溪市| 台中市| 南投县| 奈曼旗| 横峰县| 翁源县| 新密市| 盖州市| 和平区| 噶尔县| 富民县| 灵川县| 陈巴尔虎旗| 常州市| 得荣县| 阳高县| 孝昌县| 锦州市| 宜州市| 观塘区| 什邡市| 如皋市| 宁国市| 同心县| 珲春市| 伽师县| 化德县| 东乌珠穆沁旗| 伊吾县| 大洼县| 深泽县| 富裕县| 壶关县| 丽江市| 玉屏| 桑日县|