找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Research, Ethics and Risk in the Authoritarian Field; Marlies Glasius,Meta de Lange,Kris Ruijgrok Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2018 The Editor(s) (if appl

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 38839|回復(fù): 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:34:46 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱Research, Ethics and Risk in the Authoritarian Field
編輯Marlies Glasius,Meta de Lange,Kris Ruijgrok
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/829/828074/828074.mp4
概述Builds on the authors‘ extensive and recent first-hand experiences in authoritarian areas.Treats the challenges of the authoritarian field comprehensively and cross-regionally in the first Open Access
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Research, Ethics and Risk in the Authoritarian Field;  Marlies Glasius,Meta de Lange,Kris Ruijgrok Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2018 The Editor(s) (if appl
描述.This open access book offers a synthetic reflection on the authors’ fieldwork experiences in seven countries within the framework of ‘Authoritarianism in a Global Age’, a major comparative research project. It responds to the demand for increased attention to methodological rigor and transparency in qualitative research, and seeks to advance and practically support field research in authoritarian contexts. Without reducing the conundrums of authoritarian field research to a simple how-to guide, the book systematically reflects and reports on the authors’ combined experiences in (i) getting access to the field, (ii) assessing risk, (iii) navigating ‘red lines’, (iv) building relations with local collaborators and respondents, (v) handling the psychological pressures on field researchers, and (vi) balancing transparency and prudence in publishing research. It offers unique insights into this particularly challenging area of field research, makes explicit how the authors handled methodological challenges and ethical dilemmas, and offers recommendations where appropriate.?.
出版日期Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2018
關(guān)鍵詞Open Access; research ethics; authoritarian countries; research methodology; research in the authoritari
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68966-1
isbn_softcover978-3-319-88692-3
isbn_ebook978-3-319-68966-1
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱Research, Ethics and Risk in the Authoritarian Field影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Research, Ethics and Risk in the Authoritarian Field影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Research, Ethics and Risk in the Authoritarian Field網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Research, Ethics and Risk in the Authoritarian Field網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Research, Ethics and Risk in the Authoritarian Field被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Research, Ethics and Risk in the Authoritarian Field被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Research, Ethics and Risk in the Authoritarian Field年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Research, Ethics and Risk in the Authoritarian Field年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Research, Ethics and Risk in the Authoritarian Field讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Research, Ethics and Risk in the Authoritarian Field讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:38:21 | 只看該作者
Entering the Field,have faced, and what we can do to assess and mitigate those risks. We conclude that while we should be aware of risk and try to minimize it, we need to accept that risk cannot be eliminated if we want to engage in authoritarian fieldwork.
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:36:45 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:51:49 | 只看該作者
Building and Maintaining Relations in the Field,characteristics, presenting a version of ourselves that helps us get information. We reflect on having been subject to manipulation by local contacts and respondents. Finally, we consider the debt we owe collaborators and respondents in the field, and the limited ways in which we can do something in return.
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:44:38 | 只看該作者
Mental Impact, results, and a sense of shame and career worries associated with not getting them, can compound negative impact of fieldwork. Finally though, we also record the positive effects of fieldwork on our psyche and worldview. We conclude with the importance of making it possible to talk about mental impact, before, during, and after fieldwork.
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:15:53 | 只看該作者
Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2018m in a Global Age’, a major comparative research project. It responds to the demand for increased attention to methodological rigor and transparency in qualitative research, and seeks to advance and practically support field research in authoritarian contexts. Without reducing the conundrums of auth
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:27:57 | 只看該作者
Writing It Up,our methods of working. The second is to promote a culture of controlled sharing of anonymized sources. Finally, we reflect on trade-offs between publicly criticizing authoritarian regimes and future access to the authoritarian field.
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:10:33 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:43:56 | 只看該作者
Introduction,ook useful. By recording our joint experiences in very different authoritarian contexts systematically and succinctly, comparing and contrasting them, and drawing lessons, we aim to give other researchers a framework, so they will not need to start from scratch as we did. It is not the absence of fr
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:46:08 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-28 14:48
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
孟州市| 河南省| 加查县| 介休市| 叶城县| 贵德县| 安西县| 揭东县| 登封市| 太保市| 南雄市| 太仆寺旗| 昭苏县| 绍兴县| 达拉特旗| 昭觉县| 滨海县| 娄底市| 芦山县| 津南区| 浏阳市| 繁峙县| 宁阳县| 安龙县| 利津县| 廉江市| 灵宝市| 淮滨县| 云和县| 泗洪县| 静安区| 林甸县| 灵璧县| 镇坪县| 荃湾区| 湖北省| 阳城县| 荥经县| 朝阳区| 阿坝| 兴文县|