Titlebook: Republics at War, 1776-1840; Revolutions, Conflic Pierre Serna (Professor, Director),Antonino France Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a divisi

婉言

書目名稱Republics at War, 1776-1840影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Republics at War, 1776-1840影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Republics at War, 1776-1840網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Republics at War, 1776-1840網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Republics at War, 1776-1840被引頻次




書目名稱Republics at War, 1776-1840被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Republics at War, 1776-1840年度引用




書目名稱Republics at War, 1776-1840年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Republics at War, 1776-1840讀者反饋




書目名稱Republics at War, 1776-1840讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Popcorn

Republics at War, 1776-1840978-1-137-32882-3Series ISSN 2634-6699 Series E-ISSN 2634-6702

盟軍

blister

NOCT

Book 2013This collection probes the troubling connections between war and republic during Revolutionary era, 1776-1840. It presents the work of an international team of scholars, some of them in English for the first time.

可憎

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137328823Civil War; conflicts; Europe; France; peace; revolution; Spain

Notify

Can a Powerful Republic Be Peaceful?ions profoundly incompatible with those of the Old Regime European order prompted a reflection on the break with the past produced by the Revolution. Could the Republic be readmitted into a new European order of powers? Was it not forced by its very nature to wage permanent war? Could a strong repub

Rheumatologist

Tone and the French Expeditions to Ireland, 1796–1798: Total War, or Liberation?ry kept by Theobald Wolfe Tone, revolutionary Ireland’s most influential secret negotiator in Paris and an iconic figure in Irish nationalist history. He had proposed such a standard to the Directory in Paris on 23 June 1796 for the vanguard of the French invasion force for which he had successfully

Assault

A Patriotic School: The Recruitment of the Italian Legion in France, 1799–1800 on a formal level, he included full recognition of the principle of Italian nationalism and insistently promoted himself as a figure concerned with the establishment, through arms, of liberty. And, as is known, Bonaparte in fact would develop this particular political argument on the occasion of hi

biopsy

Fratricide: Tragic Brothers, Masculine Violence, and the Republic on the French Stage, 1799ad body to dogs and birds of prey outside the walls of Thebes. Legouvé’s decision to extend the final scenes as the two brothers sank their swords into each other stunned the audience; some thought it a ‘monstrosity’.. He justified the theme, explaining that ‘the hatred between two brothers is more