Titlebook: Republican Legal Theory; The History, Constit M. N. S. Sellers Book 2003 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 200

歸納

書目名稱Republican Legal Theory影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Republican Legal Theory影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Republican Legal Theory網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Republican Legal Theory網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Republican Legal Theory被引頻次




書目名稱Republican Legal Theory被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Republican Legal Theory年度引用




書目名稱Republican Legal Theory年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Republican Legal Theory讀者反饋




書目名稱Republican Legal Theory讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

致詞

FEMUR

Republican Influences on the French and American Revolutions, destiny of the republican model of government” was “., perhaps … ., staked on the experiment entrusted to the hands of the American People”.. A new “Senate” would meet on the “Capitol” hill, overlooking the “Tiber” (formerly “Goose Creek”) river, as in Rome,. to restore “the sacred fire of liberty”

溫室

Republican Legal Systems,cero, Polybius and their contemporaries, and by their various heirs and imitators in Italy, England, France, and the United States of America.. Republicans argue that serving the public good constitutes the only sound basis for a just legal order, and conclude that all laws in all jurisdictions dese

Thrombolysis

Republican Impartiality,isagreement about what the common good entails. Well-intentioned people, who seek to serve the public good, will still need some common standpoint from which to evaluate their differing perceptions of what the public good requires, before implementing their views as laws, through the power of the st

confide

Republican Authority,oth grew out of a seventeenth-century British culture that valued liberty, and sought to defend it through law, by carefully defining the scope and proper purpose of lawful authority. Yet after 1776 the two nations diverged. English lawyers began to reconceptualize the authority of law in language d

FIR

coagulate

Ideals of Public Discourse,m of government, laws and the state is to serve the common good of the people, then public discourse offers the primary practical technique for finding (or clarifying) what the laws should require. “Public discourse” (in this sense) regards public policy as distinguished from “private discourse” amo

要塞

Group Rights and Democracy,ve for the first republic, in Rome, was all Roman citizens, each of whom enjoyed “l(fā)iberty” (.), by which the Romans meant equal freedom from arbitrary interference or coercion by others, including officers of the state.. Republican legal theory depends on aggregating citizens into a group (the “peop

調(diào)情

Republicanism, Liberalism and the Law,.. Both terms continue to attract new meanings, in pursuit of various legal and political goals.. Recently, some lawyers have contrasted that liberalism which regards law as a necessary evil with republican visions of cultural self-expression through law.. This misstates the historical origins and b