Titlebook: Repositioning Platforms in Digital Market Law; Du?an V. Popovi?,Rainer Kulms Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), un

whiplash

書目名稱Repositioning Platforms in Digital Market Law影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Repositioning Platforms in Digital Market Law影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Repositioning Platforms in Digital Market Law網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Repositioning Platforms in Digital Market Law網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Repositioning Platforms in Digital Market Law被引頻次




書目名稱Repositioning Platforms in Digital Market Law被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Repositioning Platforms in Digital Market Law年度引用




書目名稱Repositioning Platforms in Digital Market Law年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Repositioning Platforms in Digital Market Law讀者反饋




書目名稱Repositioning Platforms in Digital Market Law讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

aplomb

Platform Regulation: Ex Ante Tools and Strategies in the Regulatory Toolkit,ent strategies and compliance schemes on their own entails the possibility of undesired risk-enhancing effects of the risk-based regulation and the mechanisms it mandates. This Chapter argues that the internalisation of the platforms’ responsibility for management of systemic risks and compliance wi

nullify

The Interoperability Requirements for Digital Gatekeepers,pers, including the need to ensure user data portability and the provision of technical interfaces for interoperability. The paper reflects on the broader legal and economic implications of the DMA’s interoperability requirements, arguing that while promoting competition and innovation, these also r

Modicum

鄙視

,The Digital Platforms’ Sisyphean Task: Reconciling Content Moderation and Freedom of Expression, which is not illegal nor in violation of platforms terms of service but rather undesirable. The use of such techniques clearly generates risk of censorship. The paper addresses these concerns while providing an analysis of relevant provisions of the Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive

Awning

Moving Towards More Transparent Online Platforms Under the Digital Services Act,to the process, therefore, third parties, such as consumers, civil society and SMEs, will play role in enforcing the transparency obligations set out in DSA. Second, one of the most challenging imprecisions in the DSA results from that, in many instances, the DSA is silent on the scope and/or the fo

中古

Stakeholder Engagement in EU Digital Platform Regulations: Ways Forward and Persisting Gaps,tes the codified tools for stakeholder-driven co-regulation within digital platforms’ public and private ordering spheres. Conclusions will highlight persistent downsides and gaps of the assessed stakeholders’ participatory spaces in the digital platform ecosystem.

strdulate

Self-Preferencing Practices and Their Future After the DMA,ir economic contribution to the platform. Based on these observations, as well as design choices of the DMA with regard to its enforcement (e.g. the importance of compliance reports), the chapter argues that Art. 6.5 is unlikely to really work as a per-se rule for the ex-ante identification of prohi

Noctambulant

,Re-orientating Digital?Platform Regulation in the US and Australia: Treading Water or?Experimentingss the remedial problems of traditional legal competition?enforcement. More promising approaches would seek to resolve specific problems that arise in the platform ecology, for both collaborating firms and final users, through innovative remedial design based on the experimentalist disciplines of mo

Apraxia