找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Religious Perspectives on Bioethics and Human Rights; Joseph Tham,Kai Man Kwan,Alberto Garcia Book 2017 Springer International Publishing

[復制鏈接]
查看: 40909|回復: 50
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:30:08 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Religious Perspectives on Bioethics and Human Rights
編輯Joseph Tham,Kai Man Kwan,Alberto Garcia
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/827/826739/826739.mp4
概述The first book comparing various religious views on human rights.Contains new insights on the relationship between universal human rights and local cultural and religious diversity.Makes an excellent
叢書名稱Advancing Global Bioethics
圖書封面Titlebook: Religious Perspectives on Bioethics and Human Rights;  Joseph Tham,Kai Man Kwan,Alberto Garcia Book 2017 Springer International Publishing
描述This book deals with the thorny issue of human rights in different cultures and religions, especially in the light of bioethical issues. In this book, experts from Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, Daoism, Hinduism and Confucianism discuss the tension between their religious traditions and the claim of universality of human rights.? The East-West contrast is particularly evident with regards to human rights.? Some writers find the human rights language too individualistic and it is foreign to major religions where the self does not exist in isolation, but is normally immersed in a web of relations and duties towards family, friends, religion community, and society.? Is the human rights discourse a predominantly Western liberal ideal, which in bioethics is translated to mean autonomy and free choice?? In today’s democratic societies, laws have been drafted to protect individuals and communities against slavery, discrimination, torture or genocide.? Yet, it appears unclear at whatmoment universal rights supersede respect for cultural diversity and pluralism.? This collection of articles demonstrates a rich spectrum of positions among different religions, as they confront the ev
出版日期Book 2017
關鍵詞UNESCO declaration on bioethics and human rights; cultural diversity; human rights and cultural divers
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58431-7
isbn_softcover978-3-319-86406-8
isbn_ebook978-3-319-58431-7Series ISSN 2212-652X Series E-ISSN 2212-6538
issn_series 2212-652X
copyrightSpringer International Publishing AG 2017
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Religious Perspectives on Bioethics and Human Rights影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Religious Perspectives on Bioethics and Human Rights影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Religious Perspectives on Bioethics and Human Rights網絡公開度




書目名稱Religious Perspectives on Bioethics and Human Rights網絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Religious Perspectives on Bioethics and Human Rights被引頻次




書目名稱Religious Perspectives on Bioethics and Human Rights被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Religious Perspectives on Bioethics and Human Rights年度引用




書目名稱Religious Perspectives on Bioethics and Human Rights年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Religious Perspectives on Bioethics and Human Rights讀者反饋




書目名稱Religious Perspectives on Bioethics and Human Rights讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:31:40 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:44:16 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:34:58 | 只看該作者
Convergence of Human Rights and Duties: Towards a Global Bioethicstates. In spite of that, some critics argue that ethical relativism is so deeply engrained it prevents the emergence of substantive universal norms, permitting only procedural approaches to shared norms. We question that conclusion. An examination of the notions of rights, duties and dignity in the
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:29:55 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:13:20 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:59:23 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:00:22 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:59:51 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:14:13 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-19 14:04
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
西藏| 利津县| 息烽县| 玛沁县| 曲阳县| 驻马店市| 砚山县| 游戏| 随州市| 呼伦贝尔市| 贺兰县| 彝良县| 德钦县| 金平| 吉林市| 明星| 宝丰县| 昔阳县| 富阳市| 赤城县| 万源市| 抚州市| 库尔勒市| 潼南县| 沭阳县| 务川| 河源市| 射阳县| 普洱| 七台河市| 炎陵县| 博野县| 邮箱| 霸州市| 明水县| 新郑市| 攀枝花市| 台安县| 韩城市| 西乌| 博客|