Titlebook: Religion, Philosophy and Knowledge; Gregory W. Dawes Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 theology.Christianity.

expository

ADORE

Crepitus

Self-AuthenticationMany mystics argue that their knowledge claims require no testing, since such knowledge is ‘self-authenticating’. Does this idea make sense? This chapter argues that while there could (perhaps) be self-authenticating experiences, they are not the kind of experiences to which mystics lay claim.

MINT

Ontological ArgumentsPerhaps the most famous argument in support of belief in the God of classical theism is the ontological argument. This is an . argument, requiring as evidence nothing more than the very idea of God. This chapter outlines both St Anselm’s argument and the more recent ‘modal’ version put forward by Alvin Plantinga.

Gossamer

Vsd168

ethereal

Gregory W. DawesOffers a new method of approaching the philosophy of religion.Presents an interdisciplinary examination of religious knowledge, the aims of religion and commonly cited sources.Encompasses the research

來這真柔軟

宏偉

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43500-8theology; Christianity; faith; reason; language

裙帶關(guān)系

Book 2016e do religions purport to offer? In what idiom is it couched? From what sources do devotees draw their claims to knowledge? Are these sources reliable? Rather than trying to settle age-old questions about religious belief, the book offers its readers a set of criteria with which they can make informed decisions in matters of faith..