Titlebook: Religion and Racial Progress in Twentieth-Century Britain; Bishop Barnes of Bir Patrick T. Merricks Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable)

arouse

書目名稱Religion and Racial Progress in Twentieth-Century Britain影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Religion and Racial Progress in Twentieth-Century Britain影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Religion and Racial Progress in Twentieth-Century Britain網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Religion and Racial Progress in Twentieth-Century Britain網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Religion and Racial Progress in Twentieth-Century Britain被引頻次




書目名稱Religion and Racial Progress in Twentieth-Century Britain被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Religion and Racial Progress in Twentieth-Century Britain年度引用




書目名稱Religion and Racial Progress in Twentieth-Century Britain年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Religion and Racial Progress in Twentieth-Century Britain讀者反饋




書目名稱Religion and Racial Progress in Twentieth-Century Britain讀者反饋學科排名

Condense

Introduction,s of the relationship between eugenics and religion in Britain; and highlighting that eugenics was a strand of modernism that transcended politics, science and religion. It also includes an analysis of the historiography on British eugenics and introduces the complex conceptual relationship between modernism, eugenics and religion.

GEON

Anglican Modernism,eptance of eugenics as a central principle for spiritual and social progress. This also details how Barnes’ devotion to religious reform and desire for Anglican revival took on a modernist element; Barnes truly thought his scientific-Christianity was the saviour of modern Britain, and he was a true prophet of God.

VOC

晚間

止痛藥

Book 2017lar and Anglican interpretations of modernism, poverty, population, gender equality, pacifism and racism. This begins to address the scholastic gap on Christian eugenics while highlighting the perseverance of eugenic racism after World War Two..

肉體

Introduction,nnecting his ideology to a range of important social and political movements—from birth control to divorce reform; offering the first detailed analysis of the relationship between eugenics and religion in Britain; and highlighting that eugenics was a strand of modernism that transcended politics, sc

一大塊

嚴峻考驗

Heredity and Race,d general opinion. Building on Chap.?., this gives a fuller picture of Barnes’ ideology, in particular the division of humanity into ‘superior’ and ‘inferior’ types, both in terms of intellectual capacity and religious understanding. This allowed Barnes to demonise large sectors of the population, b

胎兒

The Eugenic Philosophy, eugenics was presented to, and received by, the public. In the absence of a totalitarian dictatorship in Britain, the success of eugenics depended on the sway of popular opinion and a variety of ‘democratic’ methods were employed to instil the eugenic philosophy.