找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Relativism and Human Rights; A Theory of Pluralis Claudio Corradetti Book 2022Latest edition Springer Nature B.V. 2022 Relativism and Human

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 23591|回復(fù): 36
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:23:50 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Relativism and Human Rights
副標(biāo)題A Theory of Pluralis
編輯Claudio Corradetti
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/827/826193/826193.mp4
概述This edition is a result of 10 years of research and engages with current debates through new sections.Contributes to the understanding of the conceptual status of human rights principles.Innovative c
圖書封面Titlebook: Relativism and Human Rights; A Theory of Pluralis Claudio Corradetti Book 2022Latest edition Springer Nature B.V. 2022 Relativism and Human
描述.This is an innovative contribution to the philosophy of human rights. Considering both legal and philosophical scholarship, the views here bear an importance on the legitimacy of international politics and international law. As a result of more than 10 years of research, this revised edition engages with current debates through the help of new sections..? .Pluralistic universalism considers that, while formal filtering criteria constitute unavoidable requirements for the production of potentially valid arguments, the exemplarity of judgmental activity, in its turn, provides a pluralistic and retrospective reinterpretation for the fixity of such criteria. While speech formal standards grounds the thinnest possible presuppositions we can make as humans, the discursive exemplarity of judgments defends a notion of validity which is both contextually dependent and "subjectively universal". According to this approach, human rights principles are embedded within our linguistic argumentative practice. It is precisely from the intersubjective and dialogical relation among speakers that we come to reflect upon those same conditions of validity of our arguments. Once translated into national
出版日期Book 2022Latest edition
關(guān)鍵詞Relativism and Human Rights; Judgement and Truth; Two Horns of the Dilemma: Relativism versus Objectiv
版次2
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-2130-9
isbn_softcover978-94-024-2132-3
isbn_ebook978-94-024-2130-9
copyrightSpringer Nature B.V. 2022
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Relativism and Human Rights影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Relativism and Human Rights影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Relativism and Human Rights網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Relativism and Human Rights網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Relativism and Human Rights被引頻次




書目名稱Relativism and Human Rights被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Relativism and Human Rights年度引用




書目名稱Relativism and Human Rights年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Relativism and Human Rights讀者反饋




書目名稱Relativism and Human Rights讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:35:09 | 只看該作者
mentative practice. It is precisely from the intersubjective and dialogical relation among speakers that we come to reflect upon those same conditions of validity of our arguments. Once translated into national978-94-024-2132-3978-94-024-2130-9
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:26:38 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:59:09 | 只看該作者
http://image.papertrans.cn/r/image/826193.jpg
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:04:17 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-2130-9Relativism and Human Rights; Judgement and Truth; Two Horns of the Dilemma: Relativism versus Objectiv
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:23:44 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:22:46 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:57:29 | 只看該作者
he conceptual status of human rights principles.Innovative c.This is an innovative contribution to the philosophy of human rights. Considering both legal and philosophical scholarship, the views here bear an importance on the legitimacy of international politics and international law. As a result of
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:45:13 | 只看該作者
Beyond Moral Relativism and Objectivismy Kant in the . is a constructivist capacity for universals which are not yet given. I incorporate such form of universalism within a reformulated discourse theory where the validity claim is made to depend on a more demanding normative standard than the Habermasian (procedural) one.
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:22:34 | 只看該作者
The Legal Dimensions of Human Rights definitional imperfections which leave doubts about its tenability as a theory. Accordingly, I show what the margins for improvement of such theory are in order to obtain a serious expectation for a lasting peace among nations.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-20 16:03
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
秦安县| 湖南省| 四川省| 连江县| 哈密市| 嘉黎县| 星座| 鄱阳县| 美姑县| 彭山县| 夹江县| 微山县| 吴桥县| 呼伦贝尔市| 哈密市| 徐州市| 芷江| 池州市| 霍城县| 会昌县| 山丹县| 江城| 霍山县| 马关县| 延寿县| 锦屏县| 吴桥县| 南开区| 祁东县| 庆阳市| 托克逊县| 平度市| 绥德县| 赤峰市| 枝江市| 正安县| 和平区| 卓尼县| 曲周县| 如皋市| 江西省|