Titlebook: Relative Income Shares; John King,Philip Regan Textbook 1976Latest edition Macmillan Publishers Limited 1976 economics.income

PEL

書目名稱Relative Income Shares影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Relative Income Shares影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Relative Income Shares網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Relative Income Shares網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Relative Income Shares被引頻次




書目名稱Relative Income Shares被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Relative Income Shares年度引用




書目名稱Relative Income Shares年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Relative Income Shares讀者反饋




書目名稱Relative Income Shares讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

愛得痛了

UTTER

Conclusion,w if any unambiguous predictions. In so far as neo-Keynesian theory can be formulated precisely, it turns out to be wrong. Finally, ignorance about the effects of trade unions on relative shares remains very substantial.

headlong

Introduction,t between workers and capitalists. Our categories of employment and property income do not exactly correspond either to neoclassical ‘factor shares’ nor to Marxian ‘class shares’, although they are considerably closer to the latter. This introductory chapter is devoted to a discussion of some important conceptual problems.

空洞

Neo-Keynesian Theories,ing the result of [the capitalists’] expenditure decisions, rather than the other way round — which is perhaps the most important difference between “Keynesian” and “pre-Keynesian” habits of thought. ([41] p. 94, n. 1).

Charade

暴行

A Survey of the Evidence,r time, rather than on comparing the level of income shares in different countries at any point in time. Apart from such notable exceptions as [11] and [60], cross-sectional studies are not often found in the literature, and most empirical work has focused on the course of relative shares within ind

scrutiny

Marginal Productivity Theory,factor markets, given technology, input supplies and consumer preferences. In its simplest form where there is only one commodity, it reduces to an explanation of functional shares in terms of input supply conditions and technology only.

易于交談

,‘Monopoly’ and Relative Shares, enjoyed by the firm. Kalecki’s pioneering work was largely undertaken in the 1930s, and was deeply influenced by the climate of the times.. Neo-classical economists were confronted by two fundamental and interwoven challenges. The microeconomic paradigm of pure competition was seen to be increasing

NEEDY