Titlebook: Reimagining Class in Australia; Marxism, Populism an Henry Paternoster Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 Class

postpartum

書目名稱Reimagining Class in Australia影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Reimagining Class in Australia影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Reimagining Class in Australia網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書目名稱Reimagining Class in Australia網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Reimagining Class in Australia被引頻次




書目名稱Reimagining Class in Australia被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Reimagining Class in Australia年度引用




書目名稱Reimagining Class in Australia年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Reimagining Class in Australia讀者反饋




書目名稱Reimagining Class in Australia讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Delirium

議程

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55450-1Class analysis; Connell; Irving; 1980‘s; Australian social history; 1970‘s; Marxism; Populism

補(bǔ)角

Henry PaternosterOffers a new critique and appraisal of the successes and failures of Marxist class analysis of Australia during the 1980s.Considers how contemporary Australian society can be understood from a histori

immunity

補(bǔ)角

Imagining Class in Australian History,These traditions have been under-studied as philosophies of class, owing to the preoccupation with finding ‘the’ correct theory of class relations. This chapter argues that a more fruitful approach to understanding ‘class’ in Australia begins with a history of ideas.

GROWL

The New Left and Marxism,m, in fact it was mainly anti-nationalist. Because the populist tradition has been misunderstood, the New Left re-articulated many of its ideas, including in the form of academic texts. These texts remain some of the key works on ‘class’ in the Australian social sciences.

jovial

,Connell and Irving’s ,,debted to the reductionist and logical determination of class that was popular at the time. This chapter argues that it, in fact, reproduced a relatively crude binary Marxist reading of Australian history, limiting its utility for future studies of class.

揉雜

Exuberance