Titlebook: Regulatory Finance; Financial Foundation Howard E. Thompson Book 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991 Arbitrage.Finance.Finan

欺騙某人

書目名稱Regulatory Finance影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Regulatory Finance影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Regulatory Finance網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Regulatory Finance網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Regulatory Finance被引頻次




書目名稱Regulatory Finance被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Regulatory Finance年度引用




書目名稱Regulatory Finance年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Regulatory Finance讀者反饋




書目名稱Regulatory Finance讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

ostensible

信徒

Carcinogen

Traditional Models: CAPM and Risk Analysise by public utilities. ., in 1944, crystallized the concept stating that “the return to the equity owner should be commensurate with returns on investments in other enterprises having corresponding risk.” But twenty years later the capital asset pricing theory of Sharpe [1964], Lintner [1965], and M

壕溝

疲憊的老馬

Issues in the Theory of Rate of Returnch model is best?” But the models are fundamentally different and the determination of what is “best” becomes . issue. Presumably, the answer to this question is that the best model is one that allows the most “accurate” calculation of the “true” required rate of return.

medium

Methodology of Comparable Earnings and DCFort, reflecting my opinion that there is little to be said concerning it. The discussion of DCF is considerably more lengthy reflecting the fact that there are substantial empirical issues associated with its use. In contrast to the comparable earnings approach, there seems to be a lot to say about

heterodox

The Methodology for Risk Analysise specific determinant of the required rate of return--beta--than does the DCF approach. But there are both theoretical and empirical problems associated with its application. Chapters 4 and 7 discussed these in general terms. In this chapter we will discuss its application in more detail.

visceral-fat

財政