Titlebook: Reforging the Great Chain of Being; Studies of the Histo Simo Knuuttila Book 1981 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 1981 Aristotle.Gottf

磨損

書目名稱Reforging the Great Chain of Being影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Reforging the Great Chain of Being影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Reforging the Great Chain of Being網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Reforging the Great Chain of Being網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Reforging the Great Chain of Being被引頻次




書目名稱Reforging the Great Chain of Being被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Reforging the Great Chain of Being年度引用




書目名稱Reforging the Great Chain of Being年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Reforging the Great Chain of Being讀者反饋




書目名稱Reforging the Great Chain of Being讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

GLIB

Gaps in the Great Chain of Being: An Exercise in the Methodology of the History of Ideas,But when everything is said and done — and read and understood — surely the most appropriate key for the music of Clio, the Muse of History, is irony. Any such irony can scarcely be sharper than the one created by a juxtaposition of the following two quotes. (I call your attention especially to the

crease

Empty Forms in Plato, later scholars have usually agreed with Aristotle.. Unfortunately, there is no agreement about what Plato’s claim amounts to. In this article, I examine and refute one proposed interpretation of Plato’s thesis. According to this interpretation, the separation and priority of the Forms consisted, fo

BOAST

嚴峻考驗

Aristotle and the Priority of Actuality,t with.] is the problem whether the elements are [i.e., exist]. potentially or in some other way. For if [they exist] in another way, there will be something else prior to the principles (for potentiality is prior to this sort of cause, but it is not necessary for everything potential to obtain in t

synovium

Juvenile

,Leibniz on Plenitude, Relations, and the ‘Reign of Law’, opinions some which seem false to me, and even dangerous, this does not keep me from saying that we owe nearly as much to Galileo and to him in philosophical matters as to the whole of antiquity. At present I recall only one of the ... dangerous propositions.... It is in the ., Part III, Article 47

anniversary

,Kant on ‘The Great Chain of Being’ or the Eventual Realization of All Possibilities: A Comparative on historians of ideas — is the assumption which in its crude form says that in the long run everything possible happens. In a slightly more guarded formulation, it says that no possibility can remain unfulfilled through an infinity of time. In this sense, every (permanent) possibility is sometimes

使入迷

話

Aristotle on the Realization of Possibilities in Time,iar about the way Aristotle was wont to operate with the concepts of necessity and possibility is already betrayed by his repeated statements to the effect that the past is necessary.’ Natural though such statements sound, the sense of necessity involved here is not a familiar part of the conceptual repertoire of today’s philosophers.