找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Reflections on the Foundations of Mathematics; Univalent Foundation Stefania Centrone,Deborah Kant,Deniz Sarikaya Book 2019 Springer Nature

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: gingerly
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:43:50 | 只看該作者
Models of HoTT and the Constructive View of Theoriesnstructive view of theories according to which a theory is essentially characterised by its methods. The constructive view of theories was earlier defended by Ernest Nagel and a number of other philosophers of the past but available logical means did not allow these people to build formal representa
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 14:40:57 | 只看該作者
Set Theory and Structuresnguage focusses on properties that can be determined up to isomorphism within a category, whereas set theory admits of properties determined by the internal structure of the membership relation. Various objections have been raised against this aspect of set theory in the category-theoretic literatur
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 19:06:17 | 只看該作者
A New Foundational Crisis in Mathematics, Is It Really Happening?overy has generated in the community of mathematicians, philosophers and computer scientists might indicate a new crisis in the foundation of mathematics. By examining the mathematical facts behind HoTT and their relation with the existing foundations, we conclude that the present crisis is not one.
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 00:59:31 | 只看該作者
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 03:13:47 | 只看該作者
What Do We Want a Foundation to Do?d every classical mathematical theorem can be proved from the axioms of set theory. This is obviously a remarkable mathematical fact, but it isn’t obvious what makes it ‘foundational’. This paper begins with a taxonomy of the jobs set theory does that might reasonably be regarded as foundational. It
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 09:27:40 | 只看該作者
Formal and Natural Proof: A Phenomenological Approaches. Philosophia Mathematica (III) 15:291–320, 2007) that the formalization of a mathematical proof requires a quality of understanding that subsumes all acts necessary for checking the proof and that, consequently, automatic proof checking cannot lead to an epistemic gain about a proof. We present a
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 11:44:39 | 只看該作者
Varieties of Pluralism and Objectivity in Mathematicsbased on basic principles and ideas (later axioms) to which the rest of mathematics could be reduced. There was supposed to be only one foundational theory and it was to carry the philosophical weight of giving the ultimate ontology and truth of mathematics. Under this conception of ‘foundation’ plu
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 15:09:03 | 只看該作者
Higher Structures in Homotopy Type Theoryse involving an infinite hierarchy of coherence data such as semi-simplicial types, as well as the problem of developing the meta-theory of homotopy type theories in Univalent Foundations. We also discuss some proposed solutions.
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 22:59:23 | 只看該作者
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 00:29:20 | 只看該作者
A New Foundational Crisis in Mathematics, Is It Really Happening? We reiterate a pluralist vision of the foundations of mathematics..The article contains a short survey of the mathematical and historical background needed to understand the main tenets of the foundational issues.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-24 11:41
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
西贡区| 且末县| 兴安盟| 奎屯市| 武胜县| 扬州市| 临武县| 彰化市| 和田市| 会昌县| 浮梁县| 龙海市| 西峡县| 定南县| 尚志市| 汉源县| 宣汉县| 普兰县| 瓮安县| 郸城县| 时尚| 获嘉县| 连山| 通许县| 遂宁市| 福清市| 腾冲县| 蒲城县| 滨州市| 德江县| 桦南县| 黎川县| 安福县| 临江市| 邹城市| 浏阳市| 临夏市| 拉孜县| 紫阳县| 汝阳县| 托克托县|