找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Reductionism and Cultural Being; A Philosophical Crit Joseph Wayne Smith Book 1984 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague 1984 materialism.

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: Extraneous
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 04:55:20 | 只看該作者
Statement of the argument: Philosophical orientation and the theoretical framework for critique,overall argument of the work. Second I shall give some discussion and defense of the philosophical orientation of the work itself, and defend the project against some arguments which critics may advance to discredit, devalue and reject, the overall project. Such critical self-reflexivity is necessar
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 09:59:05 | 只看該作者
Philosophico-methodological reductionism: The alleged case against culturology,al programme, either in general, or specifically with regards to the explanation and understanding of human behaviour. The epistemological and methodological criticisms advanced against both a human Sociobiology and Sociobiology in general (summarized in [Ruse, 1979]), have been advanced to establis
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 15:03:52 | 只看該作者
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 15:56:24 | 只看該作者
Causal-explanatory reductionism I: A philosophico-biological critique of Sociobiology, biological critique can be made of Sociobiology. This claim in itself is interesting and controversial, but is not exceedingly radical. The arguments developed by Richard Burian [1978], Richard Lewontin [1977] and the Sociobiology Study Group [1977], would seem to strike at the heart of any attempt
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 21:39:46 | 只看該作者
Causal-explanatory reductionism II: The metaphysics of the selfish gene,there that the faultes must be extended one stage further. It was stated there that the faults with Sociobiology illustrated basic defects in tge neo-Darwinist position. My precious argument was concerned quite extensively with the semantical, logical and methodological defects of neo-Darwinism. The
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 02:42:47 | 只看該作者
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 05:24:20 | 只看該作者
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 10:58:12 | 只看該作者
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 14:27:05 | 只看該作者
Conclusion,t a “reduction” of Culturology/Sociology to Sociobiology, in total or in part is theoretically possible. It has been argued in this work that the PSU idea of the unification of sciences by theoretical reduction to physics is not merely unjustified, but is a claim which upon analysis is quite obscure
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 18:43:45 | 只看該作者
6樓
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 23:38
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
绍兴市| 西安市| 鄱阳县| 江阴市| 隆化县| 杨浦区| 定南县| 岱山县| 罗平县| 白银市| 林芝县| 邛崃市| 甘洛县| 沾化县| 南京市| 白沙| 那坡县| 饶平县| 永济市| 民和| 贵港市| 尚义县| 阳新县| 庄浪县| 彭泽县| 工布江达县| 浪卡子县| 旌德县| 沙坪坝区| 灌南县| 通许县| 韶山市| 宾阳县| 阳新县| 屏南县| 奉新县| 洮南市| 顺昌县| 南京市| 宜兰县| 福海县|