找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Reconciling Human Needs and Conserving Biodiversity: Large Landscapes as a New Conservation Paradigm; The Lake Tumba, Demo Bila-Isia Inogwa

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 46167|回復(fù): 59
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:34:07 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Reconciling Human Needs and Conserving Biodiversity: Large Landscapes as a New Conservation Paradigm
副標(biāo)題The Lake Tumba, Demo
編輯Bila-Isia Inogwabini
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/825/824159/824159.mp4
概述Links biodiversity conservation theoretical concepts and the field practices of these conceptual frameworks.Covers a wide spectrum of subjects, ranging from biology of conservation to conservation phi
叢書名稱Environmental History
圖書封面Titlebook: Reconciling Human Needs and Conserving Biodiversity: Large Landscapes as a New Conservation Paradigm; The Lake Tumba, Demo Bila-Isia Inogwa
描述.Protected areas have often been defined as the backbones of biodiversity conservation. Protected areas have often been defined as the backbones of biodiversity conservation. However, legitimate demands formulated by countries for their economic development, growing human populations, forest fragmentations, and needs of local communities for sustainable livelihoods are also pressing demands on protected areas, stringently pressuring conservation community to identify means to reconcile long term biodiversity conservation and communities’ livelihoods. Hence, integrating conservation activities within the global framework of economic development of countries with high biodiversity had become part of conservation paradigms. Integrated development as a route to conservation, strict protected areas, community managed areas, etc. have been tried but resulted in debatable outcomes in many ways. The lukewarm nature of these results brought ‘landscape approach’ at the front of biodiversity conservation in Central Africa. Since the late 1990s the landscape approach uses large areas with different functional attributes and shifts foundational biodiversity conservation paradigms. Changes are b
出版日期Book 2020
關(guān)鍵詞Ecology; Biodiversity; Nature conservation; Sustainability; Landscapes
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38728-0
isbn_softcover978-3-030-38730-3
isbn_ebook978-3-030-38728-0Series ISSN 2211-9019 Series E-ISSN 2211-9027
issn_series 2211-9019
copyrightSpringer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Reconciling Human Needs and Conserving Biodiversity: Large Landscapes as a New Conservation Paradigm影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Reconciling Human Needs and Conserving Biodiversity: Large Landscapes as a New Conservation Paradigm影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Reconciling Human Needs and Conserving Biodiversity: Large Landscapes as a New Conservation Paradigm網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Reconciling Human Needs and Conserving Biodiversity: Large Landscapes as a New Conservation Paradigm網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Reconciling Human Needs and Conserving Biodiversity: Large Landscapes as a New Conservation Paradigm被引頻次




書目名稱Reconciling Human Needs and Conserving Biodiversity: Large Landscapes as a New Conservation Paradigm被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Reconciling Human Needs and Conserving Biodiversity: Large Landscapes as a New Conservation Paradigm年度引用




書目名稱Reconciling Human Needs and Conserving Biodiversity: Large Landscapes as a New Conservation Paradigm年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Reconciling Human Needs and Conserving Biodiversity: Large Landscapes as a New Conservation Paradigm讀者反饋




書目名稱Reconciling Human Needs and Conserving Biodiversity: Large Landscapes as a New Conservation Paradigm讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:53:18 | 只看該作者
From Parks to Landscapes: Reading of a Long Processceptualization of the ‘biodiversity conservation landscape’ to funding mechanisms and the implementation of activities via the mapping exercises that set out to define these priority conservation areas in Central Africa.
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:42:55 | 只看該作者
Qualitatively Describing Forests of the Landscapewampy forest (34.2%) and seasonally flooded forest (28.1%). . forests of the Lake Tumba Landscape had no single species-dominated large swathes of forest, which is often the case in many areas of the region.
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:48:23 | 只看該作者
Alternative Cheaper Methods to Estimate Bonobosller zones while presence–absence is more accurate when the geographical survey cover increases beyond 2000?km.. Combining different densities the population estimated for Malebo was adjusted to the mean of 8,352 individuals, 95% CI?=?[7,952–8,747] individuals.
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:02:47 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:20:23 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:45:43 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:30:40 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:36:01 | 只看該作者
2211-9019 ts, ranging from biology of conservation to conservation phi.Protected areas have often been defined as the backbones of biodiversity conservation. Protected areas have often been defined as the backbones of biodiversity conservation. However, legitimate demands formulated by countries for their eco
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:14:06 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-8 12:06
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
敖汉旗| 济阳县| 汶川县| 甘泉县| 诸暨市| 乌审旗| 东方市| 永吉县| 晋宁县| 社旗县| 改则县| 东乌珠穆沁旗| 托克逊县| 定结县| 泰州市| 渝中区| 陇川县| 洛川县| 盐津县| 玉田县| 莫力| 体育| 神农架林区| 昔阳县| 平顺县| 大宁县| 邯郸县| 定日县| 枣阳市| 姜堰市| 台南市| 湄潭县| 许昌市| 梁河县| 寿宁县| 岚皋县| 兰西县| 临城县| 夏邑县| 西乡县| 东乌珠穆沁旗|