Titlebook: Recognition of Governments; Legal Doctrine and S M. J. Peterson Book 1997 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 19

令人不愉快

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Recognition of Governments影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Recognition of Governments影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Recognition of Governments網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Recognition of Governments網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Recognition of Governments被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Recognition of Governments被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Recognition of Governments年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Recognition of Governments年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Recognition of Governments讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Recognition of Governments讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

無(wú)政府主義者

Recognition in Multilateral Relations,w so widespread that it is impossible to examine all of it here. This chapter will concentrate on examples from the League of Nations, the United Nations, and some of the larger regional organizations.

激怒某人

Book 1997ion. It traces the evolution from the 19th century practice basing recognition mainly on effective rule to more frequent use of additional criteria in the interwar and early Cold War, to the reassertion of the primacy of effective rule since 1970 and places it in the context of contemporaneous chang

craven

indicate

Legal Rules Guiding Recognition Decisions,stablishing the acceptable reasons to recognize or withhold recognition. Understanding the mix of rule-bound and discretionary choice involved requires tracing opinions on two related issues: why international law is structured to permit an area of discretion, and identification of the binding rules that have been accepted in various periods.

發(fā)源

abreast

The Institution of Recognition of Governments,ces of that existence will be respected. In public international law, states, governments, and belligerent or insurgent groups within states are the entities to which it is commonly applied; war, foreign military occupation, neutrality, and territorial or jurisdictional claims the most prominent of

palliative-care

Limits to Recognition of Governments,s by identifying when recognition or nonrecognition of a new government in another state needs to be decided, and setting some outside limits on the legal consequences attached to recognition decisions. In tandem, the four define the area of choice within which governments set their recognition poli

RAG

Oration

The Main Criteria for Recognition,Defining effective control, no matter how acquired or maintained, as the necessary and sufficient criterion for recognition as a government affirms the sovereign autonomy of states in their internal affairs and bars international scrutiny of new regimes’ political ideologies and means of gaining pow