Titlebook: Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse; Fifty Contributions Frans H. van Eemeren Book 2015 Springer International Pub

不舒服

世俗

aphasia

抵消

The Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation Under Discussionng the quality of argumentative practices: the ways in which people in argumentative reality justify their views in communication with others and respond to the justifications of views given by others.

暖昧關(guān)系

Rationale for a Pragma-Dialectical Perspectiveion. It turns out that in order to be reasonable two requirements have to be fulfilled. The argumentation should comply with rules which are both problem-valid and intersubjectively valid. Geometrical and anthropological perspectives don’t meet these criteria, but a critical perspective does. It is

構(gòu)想

CHANT

A Procedural View of Critical Reasonablenessical approach to argumentation. Such a rationale may, in our view, be supposed to have two complementary dimensions. First, there is the dimension of ‘problem validity,’ a criterion having to do with the effectiveness of an approach, which has become the single touchstone in the logical perspective

Influx

改革運(yùn)動(dòng)

The Speech Acts of Arguing and Convincing in Externalized Discussionsthe opinion that is under discussion. If the participants are co-operative, this means that they are prepared to externalize their position with regard to the opinion and to advance argumentation for or against it. In this article, which is a condensed translation of an article originally published

abolish

Book 2015ion theory. It discusses van Eemeren’s views on the study of argumentation; the approach to argumentation adopted in pragma-dialectics; pragma-dialectical perspectives on the dialectical and pragmatic dimensions of argumentative discourse; the notion of strategic maneuvering; the pragma-dialectical