Titlebook: Realizing Social Science Knowledge; The Political Realiz B. Holzner,K. D. Knorr,H. Strasser Conference proceedings 1983 Springer-Verlag Ber

craven

大酒杯

Objectivity and Endurance: On Some Evaluative Criteria for Social Science Knowledgeecker’s writings [1970, p. 23]: “We can never avoid taking sides, so we are left with the question of whether taking sides means that some distortion is introduced into our work so great as to make it useless.”

Anguish

Some Issues in the Real Use of Scienceism when conceiving of science. In the first case, scientific realism shuts out political idealism because its prescriptive realistic science excuses it from such concerns. In the latter case, scientific idealism is defeated by scientific practice and remains two removes from the ideal community of knowledge it is unable to institutionalize.

戲服

Left-Atrium

Social Science and Practical Knowledge: Toward New Paradigmsthing these papers have in common. Secondly I shall draw attention to a specific piece of information inherent in all three papers which is not seen as an element of a possible new paradigm by the authors but which, to my opinion, may be well regarded as such— and I shall use a little more space to argue why I think so.

承認(rèn)

Research in the Service of Social Reform: The Politics of Designing Systems of Knowledge Production h cases was the allocation of financial aid and even then public debate was precipitated about whether federal aid would lead to federal control. Local autonomy remains a deeply entrenched value in the United States.

Biomarker

Introductionve been a prominent topic of discussions which range from epistemological controversies about the nature of the social sciences to debates over the fruitfulness of single programs and proposed social reforms, for example in education. The conference on which the present volume is based was designed

土坯

教育學(xué)

Objectivity and Endurance: On Some Evaluative Criteria for Social Science Knowledgecan be considered as being part of the object which he intends to study, namely the society. Influences in both directions — from society to the researcher and from the researcher to society — exist and may destroy the notion of objective knowledge. A recent formulation of this problem is found in B

Bridle

Some Issues in the Real Use of Science papers 1 was asked to review and from observations gathered throughout the meetings. As a short-hand device, the sense of the issues I raise derives from trying to keep together the internalist and externalist programs in the sociology of science. We wish to avoid both extremes of realism and ideal