Titlebook: Rationality, Virtue, and Liberation; A Post-Dialectical T Stephen Petro Book 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 Gewirt

ARGOT

書目名稱Rationality, Virtue, and Liberation影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Rationality, Virtue, and Liberation影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Rationality, Virtue, and Liberation網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Rationality, Virtue, and Liberation網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Rationality, Virtue, and Liberation被引頻次




書目名稱Rationality, Virtue, and Liberation被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Rationality, Virtue, and Liberation年度引用




書目名稱Rationality, Virtue, and Liberation年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Rationality, Virtue, and Liberation讀者反饋




書目名稱Rationality, Virtue, and Liberation讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

障礙物

吹氣

ironic

Rethinking Rationality,I set out to demonstrate that the schools of ethical rationalism, ethical naturalism, virtue ethics, and the methods of the biological and social sciences, while often opposed theoretically, in fact offer each other support and justification. In order to set this relationship right, and before explo

一瞥

Rationality and Dialectical Necessity,hical theories of Hare, Gewirth, and Habermas. All three theories share important commonalities with regards to pragmatic consistency and practical justification. These commonalities constitute a major strength in their theories and thus actually offer a powerful collective dialectical model, but th

liaison

The Dialectical Structure of Value Judgments,pts and their correlative judgments are logically and semantically intertwined with aretaic concepts. Importantly, however, deontic concepts are necessarily dependent upon aretaic concepts for their content and meaningfulness.

注射器

Virtue and the Search for Intrinsic Goodness,tical theory in . and begin to apply these analyses to the concept of rationality I characterized and defined in .. The goal of this process, to be attained in ., is to demonstrate the existence of a linguistic-conceptual framework in the concept of rationality. By acknowledging and analyzing such a

完全

Beyond Dialectical Necessity: Assertoric Necessity and the Grammar of Goodness,and virtue-theoretical. These dialectical approaches are still sound and widely applicable, I claim, but, as I have been stating elsewhere, it is only a more comprehensive aretaic theory of value which possesses the capacity to fill many of the theoretical gaps which loom large in these models. I de

讓你明白

Conclusion,it laws of morality or ethics. Indeed, natural-law theorists took and still take this position with regards to ethics. The positive-law tradition, of course, overshadowed the natural-law tradition in Europe in the nineteenth century, with its supposed pragmatism and practicality. This pragmatism and

inchoate

Book 2014lue” would be literally meaningless without four fundamental phenomena which constitute such a framework: Logical Judgment, Conceptual Synthesis, Conceptual Abstraction, and Freedom. As part of the ‘grammar of goodness,‘ the excellence of these phenomena, in a highly concrete way, constitute the essence of the greatest good, as this book explains.