Titlebook: Rational Choice and Social Welfare; Theory and Applicati Prasanta K. Pattanaik,Koichi Tadenuma,Naoki Yoshih Book 2008 Springer-Verlag Berli

雜技演員

書目名稱Rational Choice and Social Welfare影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Rational Choice and Social Welfare影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Rational Choice and Social Welfare網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Rational Choice and Social Welfare網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Rational Choice and Social Welfare被引頻次




書目名稱Rational Choice and Social Welfare被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Rational Choice and Social Welfare年度引用




書目名稱Rational Choice and Social Welfare年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Rational Choice and Social Welfare讀者反饋




書目名稱Rational Choice and Social Welfare讀者反饋學科排名

NORM

Vsd168

Harmless Homotopic Dictatorswing that, for all continuous Paretian social welfare functions there must be a homotopic dictator. What the analysis in this paper therefore shows is that Chichilnisky’s theorem is not a genuine Arrow-type impossibility theorem in the sense that desirable properties are not shown to entail some undesirable concentration of power.

Locale

To Envy or To Be Envied? Refinements of the Envy Test for the Compensation Problem(1981a, b, 1983) that one finds a first systematic study of this issue. More recent contributions to this line of research include Chauduri (1986), Diamantaras and Thomson (1990), Tadenuma (2002), and Tadenuma and Thomson (1995).

是他笨

Unemployment and Vulnerability: A Class of Distribution Sensitive Measures, its Axiomatic Propertiesd Maloney (2000), Glewwe and Hall (1998), Thorbecke (2003)). Alongside this criticism a small but rapidly growing literature is emerging that looks at various aspects of vulnerability and tries to measure it (Amin, Rai, and Topa (2003), Ligon and Schechter (2003), Pritchett, Suryahadi, and Sumarto (2000))..

DIS

Choice-Consistent Resolutions of the Efficiency-Equity Trade-Off of them are central: . (Foley, 1967 and Kolm, 1972) and . (Pazner and Schmeidler, 1978). We say that an allocation is . if no agent prefers the consumption bundle of any other agent to his own and that an allocation is . if there is a consumption bundle, called the ., such that every agent is indifferent between the bundle and his own.

engrossed

persistence

Amenable

Suzumura Consistencyof attention are quasi-transitivity and acyclicity. Quasi-transitivity demands that the asymmetric factor of a relation (the betterness relation) is transitive, whereas acyclicity rules out the presence of betterness cycles. Quasi-transitivity is implied by transitivity and implies acyclicity. The reverse implications are not valid.

leniency