Titlebook: Rancière‘s Counter-Sociology; Politics, History, E Jeremy F. Lane Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusiv

floaters

Sociology,shows how this theory emerges out of a polemical interaction with both the classical political philosophy of Aristotle and Plato and Bourdieu’s sociological theory. In the course of these polemics, sometimes explicit, often implicit, Rancière inverts and subverts certain fundamental tenets of Aristo

Esalate

權(quán)宜之計(jì)

憤怒歷史

胰島素

Mediocre

Book 2024ither to his negligence nor to some moral flaw, and nor is it merely incidental to his thought. On the contrary, Rancière understands sociology?to constitute a?.problematic., a set of assumptions and interpretative procedures whose blind spots must be identified and thought through in order that the

Ardent

Introduction,en problematic. The chapter concludes that the theories of politics, history, and education that Rancière elaborates in opposition to the sociological problematic can hence be understood to constitute a kind of ..

N防腐劑

‘s key concepts like the partition of the perceptible.Analyz.Jacques Rancière is almost unique amongst contemporary thinkers in his consistent hostility to sociologically informed modes of interpretation. This hostility is not limited to his detailed critiques of?Pierre Bourdieu—it characterises his

Offensive

Introduction, Weber, nor to his more sustained critiques of the work of Pierre Bourdieu. Rather, this critique of sociology forms an integral part of Rancière’s work in the domains of politics, history, and education, decisively influencing the nature of the original theory of politics, language, class, and hist

Ingrained