Titlebook: Race, Rights, and Justice; J. Angelo Corlett Textbook 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Blacks.Cosmopolitan liberal.H.L.A. Ha

blackout

1572-4395 eory of law is really based on USA former Supreme Court Just.Race, Rights, and Justice. explores questions of the nature of law and constitutional interpretation, international law and global justice, and the nature, function, and importance of rights each from a perspective that takes seriously the

可行

向前變橢圓

Expand

Constitutional Constructionismonalism lies constitutional constructionism. According to this theory, judges are to decide cases involving the Constitution by way of the content of the body of law itself, in conjunction with policies and extra-legal considerations. As Felix Frankfurter writes, “Every [legal] decision is a functio

大方一點

International Law law. Justice not only gives rise to law but arises out of law. It is the cause of law.…” Moreover, “International law is premised on the idea that all political communities have a strong interest in peace and in the protection of basic human rights, and that the interests of the members are greater

殖民地

Global Justice on two of the main ways of conceptualizing global justice. One such view is expressed in John Rawls’ .. Another is cosmopolitan liberalism. While there are important variations of each of these respective theories of international justice, I shall focus on their general representative positions. Wh

preservative

Individual Rightsamined theories of legal interpretation as the importance of a viable theory of legal interpretation determines which claims or interests are valid ones. Hence the connection between legal interpretation and the rights found within the content of the law.

ABASH

Collective Rightsnning to capture the attention of an increasing number of philosophers. This new concern for collective rights seems to be “the result of a recent interest in the value of communities.” Having in the previous chapter discussed some political dimensions of rights in general, I shall now clarify and a

Acumen

Interpreting the U.S. Constitution, then, that the debate is in large part between a descriptive construal of judges as historians of the meaning of the Constitution’s text and a normative account of the judge as moralist where the Constitution’s text has gaps and does not straightforwardly address a case at hand.

利用