Titlebook: Quine on Ontology, Necessity and Experience; A Philosophical Crit ?lham Dilman Book 1984 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publis

精明

書目名稱Quine on Ontology, Necessity and Experience影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Quine on Ontology, Necessity and Experience影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Quine on Ontology, Necessity and Experience網絡公開度




書目名稱Quine on Ontology, Necessity and Experience網絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Quine on Ontology, Necessity and Experience被引頻次




書目名稱Quine on Ontology, Necessity and Experience被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Quine on Ontology, Necessity and Experience年度引用




書目名稱Quine on Ontology, Necessity and Experience年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Quine on Ontology, Necessity and Experience讀者反饋




書目名稱Quine on Ontology, Necessity and Experience讀者反饋學科排名

殘廢的火焰

Are there Logical Truths?,. The second is ‘the belief that each meaningful statement is equivalent to some logical construct upon terms which refer to immediate experience’ (p. 20). He calls this latter the dogma of reductionism.

Invigorate

,Quine’s Conception of Ontology, admit into our universe’. The same preoccupation runs through the essays published in 1969 together with ‘Ontological Relativity’ (the lecture given in 1968) under that title. In fact, this question, ‘what objects exist?’, is one to which Quine keeps returning obsessively.

外貌

Ontology, Language and Existence,pigram, ‘Ontology recapitulates philogeny’, meaning that the development of the individual reduplicates the development of the species. Likewise, Quine believes, our views regarding what exists in nature, or ‘the ultimate furniture of the world’ as Russell once put it, evolve with the language that

Acetaldehyde

Language, Theory and Belief,cribe, even if not consciously and deliberately. We can become conscious of it and subject our commitments to questioning and criticism. To do so is to engage in philosophy. As something to which we subscribe Quine thinks of language as a theory, one which helps us to interpret and organise what he

BRAVE

放逐

矛盾

Ontology, Language and Existence,investigation and, therefore, responsive to reason. He holds, as we have seen, that since our ontology is internal to the language we speak and since we cannot step outside language altogether, we can only appraise our ontology in a piece-meal way, as Neurath’s captain renewed his ship plank by plank without putting ashore.

Leisureliness

Virtues