Titlebook: Questions on the Soul by John Buridan and Others; A Companion to John Gyula Klima Book 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

有害

,Durand of St.-Pour?ain and John Buridan on Species: Direct Realism with and without Representation,presentations? John Buridan defends the traditional view, “direct realism with representations,” which holds that the species represents the external object to some percipient even though it is not . the percipient perceives, but that . she perceives.

STALE

,Intellect and Intellectual Activity in Buridan’s Psychology,offer in q. 16 is an account of how dispositions belonging to one species can cause occurrent thoughts belonging to another, different species. Finally, the act of attention is presented in terms of the intellect turning on itself, that is, reflexive thought.

漸變

,Was Buridan a ‘Psychologist’ in His Logic?, avoid Frege’s criticisms. Nevertheless, he does seem to have been an adherent of what Susan Haack has called “weak psychologism”: Buridan did not think that logic involves only a description of how we . think, but that it prescribes how we . think.

PLAYS

Where Should We Discuss the Soul? On the Relation between the Doctrines of , and ,,the mixture of the Aristotelian elements and the substantial form (or substantial forms) of the resulting mixed body in the context of discussions of nature of the soul culminated in Buridan’s unified natural philosophy in which the themes from . and . supplement and reinforce each other.

注意力集中

埋葬

傾聽(tīng)

Linguistic Externalism and Mental Language in Ockham and Buridan,espect to linguistic meaning is a form of internalism. In this discussion, much hinges on the precise understanding of the medieval doctrine of ., the mechanism whereby written and spoken symbols are subordinated to acts of thought, and how this mechanism relates individual acts of thought to their publicly recognized objects.

scotoma

Awareness and Unity of Conscious Experience: Buridan on the Common Sense,wo functions are related to modern discussions about consciousness and binding, the chapter uses a type of argument that Kant called “the Achilles of rationalist psychology” to argue for Buridan’s dualism between the soul and the body, both in humans and in brute animals.

誘騙

Later Medieval Philosophy of Cognitive Psychology,so a framework for the subsequent chapters as well. In addition to outlining the broad consensus position, which he calls ‘the Neo-Aristotelian synthesis,’ King identifies ‘five specific trouble spots’ in which this consensus is threatened.

痛苦一生