找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Quantifying Approaches to Discourse for Social Scientists; Ronny Scholz Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019 tec

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: fitful
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 21:16:17 | 只看該作者
Beyond the Quantitative and Qualitative Cleavage: Confluence of Research Operations in Discourse Ananalysed with text processing methods. By highlighting strengths and weaknesses of qualitative and quantitative methods, the text advocates an integrative mixed methods approach. The text shows that scientific interpretation is bound to specific explanatory operations that pave the way for a particul
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 01:45:34 | 只看該作者
The Academic Dispositif: Towards a Context-Centred Discourse Analysisntext (i.e. the dispositif understood as an institutional arrangement of practices and structures). The authors use the discourse of academic researchers to exemplify this approach. By articulating correspondence analysis of self-representations on researchers’ homepages with institutional data of s
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 05:40:11 | 只看該作者
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 11:22:33 | 只看該作者
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 16:43:36 | 只看該作者
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 19:21:41 | 只看該作者
Text Mining for Discourse Analysis: An Exemplary Study of the Debate on Minimum Wages in Germanyanalysis, social scientists only recently became aware of the many opportunities provided by text mining. This contribution introduces unsupervised and supervised machine learning techniques to analyse a corpus covering 20 years of public discourse on statutory minimum wages in Germany. It demonstra
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 01:47:26 | 只看該作者
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 02:09:11 | 只看該作者
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 10:20:15 | 只看該作者
Multi-method Discourse Analysis of Twitter Communication: A Comparison of Two Global Political Issuemental policy/climate change and internet governance/net neutrality. Their corpus is compiled from Twitter messages containing #NetNeutrality or #ClimateChange which the authors gathered between January and March 2015. First, they map and compare the geographical landscapes of the two policy fields
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 12:41:04 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 08:23
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
西青区| 义马市| 正阳县| 西昌市| 阿拉善右旗| 开远市| 巩留县| 井冈山市| 山东省| 枣阳市| 云霄县| 彭州市| 岐山县| 平邑县| 永州市| 曲阜市| 获嘉县| 朝阳县| 麻栗坡县| 宁海县| 灵丘县| 白沙| 莎车县| 安康市| 诸城市| 柳河县| 宣化县| 醴陵市| 张家口市| 石柱| 温宿县| 南京市| 萝北县| 蒲江县| 墨竹工卡县| 尼勒克县| 安溪县| 永德县| 东城区| 高青县| 开江县|