Titlebook: Qualitative Methods in International Relations; A Pluralist Guide Audie Klotz,Deepa Prakash Book 2008 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Mac

BOLT

anus928

Process Tracingworks.’ Among many scholars – the present author included – this is an oft-heard set of complaints. Consider two examples. The central thesis of the democratic peace literature – that democracies do not fight other democracies – is hailed as one of the few law-like propositions in international rela

得罪人

相反放置

Talkative

Pragmatic Analysiss. They endeavor to identify the full range of inferences that a reader or a hearer would make when encountering the locutions of an author or a speaker, considered in context. Consequently, pragmatic analysis is suited to the practice of inquiry that Hall (1999: 210–16) terms ‘specific history,’ in

有法律效應(yīng)

解決

鋪?zhàn)?/a>

Practicing Pluralisme my chapter, like the others, is informed by personal experience, I write as a ‘learner’ and as a representative of my peers. It is based on two integral elements of the process of writing this book: the qualitative methods course that was the testing ground for the manuscript and the students who

Abnormal

Agent-based Modelingiscussion of the multiple methods of qualitative analysis, including a comparison of their kind of scholarship or knowledge production. Of course, given the goals and title of this book, one has to ask, Who let in the formal modeler?

plasma-cells

‘Qualitative’ Methods?e detail and nuance from a case than can be found by reducing it to quantitative measures. But in practice, the term is generally used simply to mean ‘not quantitative,’ as Matthew Hoffmann notes in his discussion of agent-based modeling. Qualitative methods are, in this sense, a default category.