找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Politics and Personalities; Dennis Kavanagh Book 1990 Dennis Kavanagh 1990 crisis.culture.Electoral.English.ideology.political culture.Pol

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 39585|回復(fù): 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:53:08 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Politics and Personalities
編輯Dennis Kavanagh
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/751/750385/750385.mp4
圖書封面Titlebook: Politics and Personalities;  Dennis Kavanagh Book 1990 Dennis Kavanagh 1990 crisis.culture.Electoral.English.ideology.political culture.Pol
描述A study of power in British political parties. It asks what happened to consensus politics and looks at the ideology and sociology of Labour‘s strategy. It also questions the need for a centre party and discusses political figures such as Churchill, Enoch Powell and Tony Benn.
出版日期Book 1990
關(guān)鍵詞crisis; culture; Electoral; English; ideology; political culture; Political Parties; politics; science; socio
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20961-3
isbn_softcover978-0-333-51580-8
isbn_ebook978-1-349-20961-3
copyrightDennis Kavanagh 1990
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Politics and Personalities影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Politics and Personalities影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Politics and Personalities網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Politics and Personalities網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱Politics and Personalities被引頻次




書目名稱Politics and Personalities被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Politics and Personalities年度引用




書目名稱Politics and Personalities年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Politics and Personalities讀者反饋




書目名稱Politics and Personalities讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:36:04 | 只看該作者
,Must Labour Lose — Again?, the post-1945 changes in the form of the decline of agriculture and spread of industrialism then the shift to post-industrial economies and the embourgeoisement of society. Successful parties are adaptive, able to outlive the social conditions and issues which attended their birth.
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:32:28 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:19:54 | 只看該作者
Crisis, Charisma and British Political Leadership: the Case of Winston Churchill,rld War and to see whether it meets the criteria for charismatic political leadership. Was he, for instance, a charismatic figure at a time of acute crisis in 1940? If not, is one entitled to suggest that charisma has very little place in the British political system?
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:03:14 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:13:03 | 只看該作者
The Deferential English: a Comparative Critique,een used to explain.. My concluding argument is that deference, as the concept is frequently applied to English political culture, has attained the status of a stereotype and that it is applied to such variegated and sometimes conflicting data that it has outlived its usefulness as a term in academic currency.
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:40:47 | 只看該作者
The Monarchy in Contemporary Political Culture,rentially, and others aggressively. With unintended irony Edward Shils and Michael Young comment, ‘Even the most eminent scholars lose their sureness of touch when they enter the presence of royalty’..
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:14:16 | 只看該作者
Power in British Politics: Iron Law or Special Pleading?,es’ claims about themselves and their rivals, the distribution of power within the parties was very similar, notably in the domination of the parliamentary leadership over other sections of the parties.
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:15:08 | 只看該作者
Is Thatcherism Conservative?, no Labour government, with the partial exception of the 1945 administration, has ever been able to convince its own socialists that it has made the word flesh. Ideologists may be doomed to perpetual frustration in politics because of an inevitable shortfall between principle and practice.
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:39:24 | 只看該作者
The Timing of Elections: Fair Play or Fiddle?,dissolution in the hands of the government actually produces an imbalance in the constitution, allows the government unfair advantage over the opposition in manipulating the economy for its own gain, and opens the way for executive dominance.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-20 00:01
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
崇义县| 盐池县| 永吉县| 松江区| 都江堰市| 松溪县| 大港区| 象州县| 北碚区| 朝阳区| 湛江市| 揭东县| 清丰县| 金乡县| 钦州市| 罗山县| 通河县| 临西县| 太康县| 临洮县| 三台县| 阜南县| 彰化县| 罗山县| 独山县| 固镇县| 麦盖提县| 博罗县| 广安市| 高碑店市| 新蔡县| 安龙县| 合作市| 鹤岗市| 绥化市| 黎川县| 班戈县| 贵德县| 和田县| 改则县| 阜康市|