找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Political Equilibrium: A Delicate Balance; Peter C. Ordeshook,Kenneth A. Shepsle Book 1982 Kluwer · Nijhoff Publishing 1982 Institution.In

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 17119|回復(fù): 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:23:58 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Political Equilibrium: A Delicate Balance
編輯Peter C. Ordeshook,Kenneth A. Shepsle
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/751/750151/750151.mp4
叢書名稱Studies in Public Choice
圖書封面Titlebook: Political Equilibrium: A Delicate Balance;  Peter C. Ordeshook,Kenneth A. Shepsle Book 1982 Kluwer · Nijhoff Publishing 1982 Institution.In
出版日期Book 1982
關(guān)鍵詞Institution; Institutions; Political Science; economy; politics
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7380-0
isbn_softcover978-94-009-7382-4
isbn_ebook978-94-009-7380-0Series ISSN 0924-4700 Series E-ISSN 2731-5258
issn_series 0924-4700
copyrightKluwer · Nijhoff Publishing 1982
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Political Equilibrium: A Delicate Balance影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Political Equilibrium: A Delicate Balance影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Political Equilibrium: A Delicate Balance網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Political Equilibrium: A Delicate Balance網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Political Equilibrium: A Delicate Balance被引頻次




書目名稱Political Equilibrium: A Delicate Balance被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Political Equilibrium: A Delicate Balance年度引用




書目名稱Political Equilibrium: A Delicate Balance年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Political Equilibrium: A Delicate Balance讀者反饋




書目名稱Political Equilibrium: A Delicate Balance讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:58:07 | 只看該作者
Political Disequilibrium and Scientific Inquirycesses. More importantly, Riker’s conclusions call into question the objectives and methodologies of most students of politics. While not all of us abide by the same paradigm, or use a similar professional argot, most of us do share, knowingly or unknowingly, a common goal: to search for political e
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:09:35 | 只看該作者
An altimeter for Mr. Escher’s stairwayd some 195 years ago in Condorcet’s . (1785) is this: Given three or more alternatives (say laws or candidates and three of more voters, majorities may march in circles even while individuals do not. The contemporary literature presents an essentially two-sided extension of Condorcet’ little discove
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:40:22 | 只看該作者
Equilibrium, Disequilibrium, and the General Possibility of a Science of Politicsies of theorems that depict the chaotic features of majority-rule voting systems. These theorems, proved elegantly in recent papers by Cohen (1979), McKelvey (1976, 1979) and Schofield (1978), establish that the cyclicity of the majority preference relation is both generic and pervasive. To paraphra
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:11:19 | 只看該作者
The Limitations of Equilibrium Analysis in Political Scienceoming), has offered a serious challenge to positive political theorists. Our essay is intended to do two things. First, we argue that the prospects for a science of politics are, perhaps, not as dismal as a reading of Riker’s essays suggest. We, at least, remain hopeful if not optimistic. Second, we
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:08:00 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:23:22 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:01:00 | 只看該作者
Political Inequalitythe theoretical search for conditions underlying political equilibria or their absence has largely been carried on under assumptions of political equality among voters in single, well-defined constituencies electing representatives to unicameral legislatures. This is as it should be in normal scienc
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:15:40 | 只看該作者
Sophisticated Voting under the Plurality Procedureaps the most obviously manipulable of all voting procedures. Political observers have long noted that when most of the votes will be split between two candidates, sup-porters of minor candidates are torn between “wasting” their vote on an obvious loser while expressing their first preference and vot
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:33:40 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 16:04
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
专栏| 林西县| 马边| 临泽县| 婺源县| 南漳县| 合川市| 封丘县| 磐石市| 新巴尔虎左旗| 三河市| 彝良县| 稻城县| 连云港市| 米泉市| 黑水县| 盘山县| 辰溪县| 内丘县| 六安市| 仁寿县| 无锡市| 上栗县| 双牌县| 潢川县| 丰城市| 济宁市| 拉萨市| 五原县| 舟山市| 湘乡市| 麟游县| 阿克苏市| 永昌县| 马龙县| 陆川县| 克东县| 鄂温| 汶川县| 屯留县| 财经|