Titlebook: Political Decision-Making in Switzerland; The Consensus Model Pascal Sciarini,Manuel Fischer,Denise Traber Book 2015 The Editor(s) (if app

BID

書目名稱Political Decision-Making in Switzerland影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Political Decision-Making in Switzerland影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Political Decision-Making in Switzerland網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Political Decision-Making in Switzerland網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Political Decision-Making in Switzerland被引頻次




書目名稱Political Decision-Making in Switzerland被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Political Decision-Making in Switzerland年度引用




書目名稱Political Decision-Making in Switzerland年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Political Decision-Making in Switzerland讀者反饋




書目名稱Political Decision-Making in Switzerland讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

單色

voluble

More Power Balance, Less Consensus: Changes in Decision-Making Structures over Time,pter turns to the analysis of changes in decision-making structures: that is, changes in power, cooperation and conflict relations among political actors. While the previous chapter concerned the ‘polity’ dimension of policy-making, the present chapter addresses the ‘politics’ dimension. The general

–DOX

Looking beneath the Surface: Differences in Decision-Making Structures across Processes,eneral picture and allows for a comparison over time with the decision-making structure in the 1970s. However, the analysis of the overall decision-making structure potentially neglects important differences between policy domains (Atkinson and Coleman 1989; Knoke et al. 1996; Kriesi et al. 2006a; S

dysphagia

Ataxia

Coalition Formation in Parliament and during the Policy Process,ar preferences form coalitions in order to gain more influence in the policy process. In the Swiss political system in particular, institutional veto points and the consensual culture of policy-making provide strong incentives for actors to form large coalitions. Coalitions are thus especially impor

尾巴

Conflagration

,‘Going Public’: The Mediatization of Decision-Making Processes,bly as a shift towards an ‘a(chǎn)udience democracy’ (Manin 1995) or the ‘mediatization of politics’ (Mazzoleni and Schulz 1999), emphasizes the increasing importance of the media for political actors and political decision-making. In such a context, political actors need to communicate with both the medi

調(diào)味品

有毒

,Who is Successful and Who Is Not? Actors’ Satisfaction with the Policy Output,s of consensus democracies are designed to accommodate conflict in heterogeneous societies by offering a variety of societal groups access to the political decision-making process (Lijphart 1999). It is, however, not entirely clear if and how preferences are included in political decisions. Intuitiv