找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Overlooking Conventions; The Trouble With Lin Michael Devitt Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 Semantics vs Pragmatics.What is

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 11041|回復(fù): 50
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:44:28 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Overlooking Conventions
副標(biāo)題The Trouble With Lin
編輯Michael Devitt
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/706/705256/705256.mp4
概述Criticizes the reliance on intuitions in theorizing about language.Proposes a scientifically sound methodology for the semantics/pragmatics dispute.Identifies the common confusion of what constitutes
叢書名稱Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology
圖書封面Titlebook: Overlooking Conventions; The Trouble With Lin Michael Devitt Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 Semantics vs Pragmatics.What is
描述.This book criticizes the methodology of the recent semantics-pragmatics debate in the theory of language and proposes an alternative. It applies this methodology to argue for a traditional view against a group of “contextualists” and “pragmatists”, including Sperber and Wilson, Bach, Carston, Recanati, Neale, and many others.? The author disagrees with these theorists who hold that the meaning of the sentence in an utterance never, or hardly ever, yields its literal truth-conditional content, even after disambiguation and reference fixing; it needs to be pragmatically supplemented in context..The standard methodology of this debate is to consult intuitions. The book argues that theories should be tested against linguistic usage. Theoretical distinctions, however intuitive, need to be scientifically motivated. Also we should not be guided by Grice’s “Modified Occam’s Razor”, Ruhl’s “Monosemantic Bias”, or other such strategies for “meaning denialism”. From this novel perspective, the striking examples of context relativity that motivate contextualists and pragmatists typically exemplify semantic rather than pragmatic properties. In particular, polysemous phenomena should typically
出版日期Book 2021
關(guān)鍵詞Semantics vs Pragmatics; What is Said; Truth-conditional Pragmatics; Semantic Underdetermination; Modifi
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70653-1
isbn_softcover978-3-030-70655-5
isbn_ebook978-3-030-70653-1Series ISSN 2214-3807 Series E-ISSN 2214-3815
issn_series 2214-3807
copyrightSpringer Nature Switzerland AG 2021
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Overlooking Conventions影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Overlooking Conventions影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Overlooking Conventions網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Overlooking Conventions網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Overlooking Conventions被引頻次




書目名稱Overlooking Conventions被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Overlooking Conventions年度引用




書目名稱Overlooking Conventions年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Overlooking Conventions讀者反饋




書目名稱Overlooking Conventions讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:45:58 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:27:28 | 只看該作者
978-3-030-70655-5Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:43:15 | 只看該作者
Overlooking Conventions978-3-030-70653-1Series ISSN 2214-3807 Series E-ISSN 2214-3815
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:10:48 | 只看該作者
Michael DevittCriticizes the reliance on intuitions in theorizing about language.Proposes a scientifically sound methodology for the semantics/pragmatics dispute.Identifies the common confusion of what constitutes
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:36:36 | 只看該作者
Introduction,This chapter first provides a background to the semantics-pragmatics dispute. It then describes the main methodological and substantive conclusions of the book. Finally, it summarizes the chapters of the book.
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:27:06 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:49:47 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:47:37 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:21:06 | 只看該作者
Linguistic Conventions and Language,e “regularities in usage” needed for linguistic conventions “are few and scattered”. Furthermore, such conventions as there are do not have “any interesting bearing on the theory of meaning or knowledge of language”. I argue that these claims are very mistaken: there are many linguistic conventions
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 18:51
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
宝清县| 汉阴县| 晋州市| 保康县| 大方县| 勐海县| 佛冈县| 荥经县| 驻马店市| 罗甸县| 浙江省| 石门县| 台东市| 阿拉善盟| 临邑县| 建始县| 都昌县| 鄂托克前旗| 新龙县| 宁蒗| 马鞍山市| 图木舒克市| 邛崃市| 桑日县| 邵阳市| 周口市| 临泉县| 凉城县| 南部县| 西城区| 建德市| 台前县| 深水埗区| 民和| 疏勒县| 上栗县| 成武县| 绍兴县| 南澳县| 炎陵县| 儋州市|