Titlebook: Our Knowledge of God; Essays on Natural an Kelly James Clark Book 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1992 Renaissance.autonomy.

興奮過度

Revelationinary way of communication”.. Religions often claim to have minor as weIl as major revelations. The former are purported particular messages to individuals about matters of more immediate concern; the latter are big messages of worldshaking significance for the practice of religion. My concern will

合唱團(tuán)

lanugo

我吃花盤旋

of these attributes alone is sufficient for making a claim to divinity. It is, therefore, difficult to distinguish sharply the project of natural theology from philosophi- cal theology. The project of classical natural theology has been the attempt to prove God‘s existence and nature with arguments that empl978-94-010-5136-1978-94-011-2576-5

left-ventricle

Book 1992lation. Philosophical theology, which employs the rational methods of natural theology, is not restricted to premises that are discernible through observation and reason; it may rightly employ premises that are knowable through special revelation. While the project of natural theology may be constru

莎草

變形詞

血友病

comely

Reference and the Refutation of Naturalismure can suggest a rival God-centered understanding. In this paper I argue that Naturalism fails when it comes to reference, and that the way it fails provides some indirect support for the claim that human beings can have a non-sentential, inarticulate, knowledge of God, prior to reasoning..The argument I shall provide is by way of modus tollens.:

安定