Titlebook: Optional Choice of Court Agreements in Private International Law; Mary Keyes Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 Optional choice

ABYSS

領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)

Chameleon

Greece: A Forum Favorable to Optional Choice of Court Agreementspresumptively weaker parties. The Brussels I Convention and Regulations have come to perfect this protection, leading to asymmetrical optional choice of court agreements, in favor of such parties, without impairing the validity of agreements in the presence of parties of presumptively equivalent neg

果核

Japan: Quests for Equilibrium and Certaintygreements as well as to ensure certainty and predictability in its application. In a quest for an optimal equilibrium, a recent amendment to the Code of Civil Procedure has introduced special rules for consumer contracts and individual employment relations, which are applicable to all choice of cour

辭職

The Netherlands: Optional Choice of Court Agreements in a Globalizing Worlde of Court Agreements, EU Regulation 44/2001, and national jurisprudence of the Netherlands Supreme Court. In respect of private interregional law of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Caribbean Civil Procedural Law Act applies to “Caribbean-Dutch” choice of court cases. Pursuant to article 8 subse

Foreshadow

Romania: Interpretation and Effects of Optional Jurisdiction Agreements in International Disputesjurisdiction agreements in international disputes in front of the Romanian courts. It clarifies the regime which regulates such agreements, and emphasizes the difficulties, the inconveniences and the uncertainties raised by the existing applicable norms.

辯論

脖子

South Africa: Time for Reformagreements, the fragmented nature of High Court jurisdiction and the common law rules relating to submission to jurisdiction present unique challenges. Two types of choice of court agreements can be identified in South African law: foreign exclusive choice of court agreements and optional choice of

euphoria

Switzerland: Choice of Court Agreements According to the Code on Civil Procedure, the Private Internntion), each of which has a specific scope of application. While all three legal sources hold different provisions regarding formal requirements, limits and effects of choice of court agreements, they do have one thing in common: None of them makes a distinction between optional and exclusive choice

善辯

Taiwan: Legislation and Practice on Choice of Court Agreements in Taiwanional and exclusive choice of court agreements, despite the fact that they are basically designed for the latter. This chapter addresses the legislative development and judicial practice on such agreements. Section 1 explores the legislation on jurisdictional agreements with emphasis on their limita