Titlebook: Optimal Transport and Applications to Geometric Optics; Cristian E. Gutiérrez Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), u

無(wú)限

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Optimal Transport and Applications to Geometric Optics影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Optimal Transport and Applications to Geometric Optics影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Optimal Transport and Applications to Geometric Optics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Optimal Transport and Applications to Geometric Optics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Optimal Transport and Applications to Geometric Optics被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Optimal Transport and Applications to Geometric Optics被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Optimal Transport and Applications to Geometric Optics年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Optimal Transport and Applications to Geometric Optics年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Optimal Transport and Applications to Geometric Optics讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Optimal Transport and Applications to Geometric Optics讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

SNEER

Cristian E. Gutiérrezthat the Fichtean argument presents in this book, some interpretations argue that Fichte’s ethics could be understood as consequentialist or as agent-neutral perfectionism. I squarely argue against this consequentialist interpretation and express doubt about some aspects of the perfectionism alterna

Lobotomy

Cristian E. Gutiérrezegger, calls “commitment” (.) or “resoluteness” (.). There is something paradoxical about commitment, however. As Joseph Rouse puts it: A “self-determined commitment could have only the . of authority,” since, “as Kierkegaard trenchantly noted, the authority that a commitment could secure through se

detach

Cristian E. Gutiérrezst invoked in the context of the French third Republic, as a way to confront the challenge of social integration. Some of those problems revolve around the naturalistic fallacy (does solidarity merely refer to the fact of human interdependence or does it involve a duty?), while others concern the na

miniature

AGOG

pters in the first part (“Normativity and Social Bonds from Kant to Heidegger”) aim to explore these themes in the philosophy of Kant, Fichte, Hegel, Husserl, and Heidegger. They examine the phenomenon of “bindingness”, i.e., why and how we are bound. By bond, we mean something broader than strict m

字形刻痕

Cristian E. Gutiérrezegger, calls “commitment” (.) or “resoluteness” (.). There is something paradoxical about commitment, however. As Joseph Rouse puts it: A “self-determined commitment could have only the . of authority,” since, “as Kierkegaard trenchantly noted, the authority that a commitment could secure through se

Talkative

Cristian E. GutiérrezIn: Zollschan GK, Hirsch HW (eds) Explorations in social change. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1964) is the springboard for sketching a brief, analytical history of progressive reductions in social bonds and bonding during late modernity. When taken together with the systemic crises of the new millenniu

fibroblast

Offensive

r this question, I consider two different and complementary approaches to the issue of surveillance: the now classic view of Bauman and the more recent, but already well-known, view of Zuboff. I show how Bauman focuses mainly on subjective factors, represented by the psychic motivations of the user,