Titlebook: Opium and Empire in Southeast Asia; Regulating Consumpti Ashley Wright Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Lim

Ovulation

,The Fashioning of Colonial Opium Policy in Arakan and Tenasserim, 1826–1852,ow much — before the colonial era. Nonetheless, in order to better understand the development of the colonial opium industry this chapter briefly discusses opium consumption in pre-colonial Burma and outlines the British East India Company’s involvement in the Asian opium trade prior to the annexati

Morsel

,Regulating Opium in British Burma, 1852–1885: Addiction, Ethnicity and Revenue,e War of 1885. Imperial opium policy changed in this period, as the increased bureaucratisation of colonial rule brought colonial officials an increased knowledge of the extent of opium consumption and addiction in British-ruled Lower Burma. It became clear to colonial officials and Burmese elders t

Repetitions

,“Lady Britannia, her Children, her Step-Children and her Neighbours”: Race and the Regulation of Co, the province had developed a system of opium regulation that differed significantly from that of any other province in British India. Assumptions about the right of the colonial state to regulate the consumption habits of Burmese subjects collided with an evolving set of discourses about race to c

macabre

極深

Opium and the Maintenance of Imperial Rule: The Royal Commission on Opium and the Rationale for Bri personal observations of the social context of opium consumption. As noted at the beginning of the previous chapter, the collected witness testimonies and final report of the Commission are rich material for analysis of the complex connection between imperialism and opium policy in colonial Burma.

institute

The Expansion of the Opium Industry in Burma, and the Beginning of the Age of International Conferethe British Empire. The nineteenth century anti-opium movement survived into the twentieth century, but it underwent a change in identity. In the nineteenth century, colonial officials making opium policy decisions in Burma were aware of scrutiny from, and were susceptible to campaigning from the Lo

encomiast

Burma, the League of Nations and Transnational Opium Policy Networks,olicy network. In the 1920s and 30s, Burma’s position in this network influenced the way that the British administration articulated its drug policy rationale. Burmese nationalists, as they became increasingly active against the colonial regime, condemned the effects that opium consumption had on th

Neonatal

苦惱

笨拙的你